Originally posted by PSRB
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Software update
We'll be upgrading our forum software over the next few days. As part of this update we will need to prune threads over 12 months old.
Downtime will be kept to a minimum during the upgrade and your usernames and passwords will still work when we are back up and running.
If you have any issues logging in please drop us an email at fmadmin@footymad.net from your registered email address quoting your username and we will help you get sorted.
Downtime will be kept to a minimum during the upgrade and your usernames and passwords will still work when we are back up and running.
If you have any issues logging in please drop us an email at fmadmin@footymad.net from your registered email address quoting your username and we will help you get sorted.
See more
See less
Let's forget about yesterday. Dwelling on that is not the answer.
Collapse
X
-
The data - I use that term loosely - that we don't have access to is what Arteta actually does with the team in training, and what his pre-match instructions are and what he tells them during the game.Originally posted by Peter View PostI think standards in the CL are lower than the premier league. We'll only really see the quality in the latter stages.
I know it isnt as simple as 'get 1-0 up and then destroy the game' but as a coach he must see that that is what is happening. He must see the lack of creativity, the drop in tempo, the lack of press. Either he doesn't care or he cant change it.
Either way, it doesn't reflect well on him
Do we really think that Arteta doesn't have the players spend time practising passing through a press and moving the ball quickly into the final third? I've seen video of them practising the final third bit, it's hard to believe they haven't been trained in the bit before that.
And if that is the case and they are encouraged to do so and to express themselves (as Arteta did publicly recently), why does it all stop as soon as we go 1-0 up? Are they told to change the way they play at that point?
Too many questions we don't have answers to, Peter.
Comment
-
-
I agree. But either way..... as I said, it's isnt a good look for him.Originally posted by WES View PostThe data - I use that term loosely - that we don't have access to is what Arteta actually does with the team in training, and what his pre-match instructions are and what he tells them during the game.
Do we really think that Arteta doesn't have the players spend time practising passing through a press and moving the ball quickly into the final third? I've seen video of them practising the final third bit, it's hard to believe they haven't been trained in the bit before that.
And if that is the case and they are encouraged to do so and to express themselves (as Arteta did publicly recently), why does it all stop as soon as we go 1-0 up? Are they told to change the way they play at that point?
Too many questions we don't have answers to, Peter.
My hunch is that he still overloads players with instructions and information. And you look at him constantly shouting at them on the touchline. That probably doesn't help.
The more you attempt to script the game, the more you remove autonomy from the players. They become less responsive to situations in-game. Less willing to take risks.
I saw Arteta talking a few months ago and he was asked what he thinks his biggest intakes were in his first few years. He said focusing too much on the tactical side and not enough on the human and personal side.
Interesting.....
Comment
-
Always going to be an issue with an inexperienced coach; the instinct to try to do too much, ask too many questions, instead of sometimes just letting it all work out, to borrow a phrase. After all, his players have more experience of playing football than he does of managing football teams. They already know what they're supposed to be doing, they are competent and conscientious professionals. Perhaps the way they keep them engaged is by constantly giving them new, interesting things to think about; corners, throw-ins maybe. Inverted midfielders.Originally posted by Peter View PostI agree. But either way..... as I said, it's isnt a good look for him.
My hunch is that he still overloads players with instructions and information. And you look at him constantly shouting at them on the touchline. That probably doesn't help.
The more you attempt to script the game, the more you remove autonomy from the players. They become less responsive to situations in-game. Less willing to take risks.
I saw Arteta talking a few months ago and he was asked what he thinks his biggest intakes were in his first few years. He said focusing too much on the tactical side and not enough on the human and personal side.
Interesting.....
Back in the day, Big Ron was asked, what's your biggest problem as manager. He said it's that, despite being in his fifties, he was still the best centre forward at the club, the best headerer of a football. Banter, of course, but the truth behind it, the managers' thinking is, these idle, fractious, drunken morons are going to get me sacked unless I keep them under my thumb at all times; they already did for the last bloke, after all. All the time and resources in the world and they can't even learn to head the ball properly
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Comment
-
True. George was the same. Although bar Alan Smith, he probably was still the best header of a ball at the club.Originally posted by redgunamo View PostAlways going to be an issue with an inexperienced coach; the instinct to try to do too much, ask too many questions, instead of sometimes just letting it all work out, to borrow a phrase. After all, his players have more experience of playing football than he does of managing football teams. They already know what they're supposed to be doing, they are competent and conscientious professionals. Perhaps the way they keep them engaged is by constantly giving them new, interesting things to think about; corners, throw-ins maybe. Inverted midfielders.
Back in the day, Big Ron was asked, what's your biggest problem as manager. He said it's that, despite being in his fifties, he was still the best centre forward at the club, the best headerer of a football. Banter, of course, but the truth behind it, the managers' thinking is, these idle, fractious, drunken morons are going to get me sacked unless I keep them under my thumb at all times; they already did for the last bloke, after all. All the time and resources in the world and they can't even learn to head the ball properly
But George knew something that our current management team dont- hear me out on this one....!
If you are going to ask a player to perform a limited, well-scripted role and do exactly what they are told, you are better off using limited players.
George didnt want the geniuses. They get bored and go off script. He wanted younger players, great professionals, and players who were good at certain things. Kevin Richardson instead of Steve Williams. Perry Groves instead of Charlie Nicholas. Michael Thomas instead of Viv Anderson. Lee Dixon instead of... well, anybody.
Maybe our current players are too good......
Comment
-
Good point. They're certainly too expensive, some say. Not me.Originally posted by Peter View PostTrue. George was the same. Although bar Alan Smith, he probably was still the best header of a ball at the club.
But George knew something that our current management team dont- hear me out on this one....!
If you are going to ask a player to perform a limited, well-scripted role and do exactly what they are told, you are better off using limited players.
George didnt want the geniuses. They get bored and go off script. He wanted younger players, great professionals, and players who were good at certain things. Kevin Richardson instead of Steve Williams. Perry Groves instead of Charlie Nicholas. Michael Thomas instead of Viv Anderson. Lee Dixon instead of... well, anybody.
Maybe our current players are too good......
Talking of Richardsons, Richie once said, a professional player must always play within himself. Meaning, we already know you've got all the shots; that's why you're here. We do not need to see them all whenever you're out in the middle. No, what we want from you now is an innings, lots of runs.
Discipline is a skill too, I guess. Anyway, results, trophies, are harder to come by without it. Just because you select a chap who can shoot from the halfway line, it doesn't mean you want him doing it every five minutes."Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Comment
-
Exactly. But there are limits.Originally posted by redgunamo View PostGood point. They're certainly too expensive, some say. Not me.
Talking of Richardsons, Richie once said, a professional player must always play within himself. Meaning, we already know you've got all the shots; that's why you're here. We do not need to see them all whenever you're out in the middle. No, what we want from you now is an innings, lots of runs.
Discipline is a skill too, I guess. Anyway, results, trophies, are harder to come by without it. Just because you select a chap who can shoot from the halfway line, it doesn't mean you want him doing it every five minutes.
If you want disciplined cricketers who do what they are told, dont pick Kevin Pieterson. Or Brian Lara, for that matter. They are too good. And they know it. Nothing you ask of them will be more effective than who they are. And discipline isnt a big part of their skill set.
Dennis left Inter because they wanted him to play with his back to goal. He tried to explain that he wasnt Alan Smith. So he moved to a club who wanted him to be Dennis.
You dont tell Dennis how to play football any more than you tell Joe Root how to play spin. Perfection is too rare in life to be tampered with.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying we should have stuck with Eddie Nketiah.....
Comment
-
I'd snap your hand off for Eddie Nketiah right now tbh.Originally posted by Peter View PostExactly. But there are limits.
If you want disciplined cricketers who do what they are told, dont pick Kevin Pieterson. Or Brian Lara, for that matter. They are too good. And they know it. Nothing you ask of them will be more effective than who they are. And discipline isnt a big part of their skill set.
Dennis left Inter because they wanted him to play with his back to goal. He tried to explain that he wasnt Alan Smith. So he moved to a club who wanted him to be Dennis.
You dont tell Dennis how to play football any more than you tell Joe Root how to play spin. Perfection is too rare in life to be tampered with.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying we should have stuck with Eddie Nketiah.....
I see Arteta spoke very well at his press conference. This title chase isn't over.
Comment
-
-
I like Eddie but he has been poorly advised. His first mistake is, strikers rarely come through the ranks at big, ambitious clubs as these clubs have too much money and therefore too little patience. The second is moving to a club that already has a bigger stronger centre forward than him. Just like in coursing; a good big 'un always beats a good little 'un.Originally posted by Peter View PostExactly. But there are limits.
If you want disciplined cricketers who do what they are told, dont pick Kevin Pieterson. Or Brian Lara, for that matter. They are too good. And they know it. Nothing you ask of them will be more effective than who they are. And discipline isnt a big part of their skill set.
Dennis left Inter because they wanted him to play with his back to goal. He tried to explain that he wasnt Alan Smith. So he moved to a club who wanted him to be Dennis.
You dont tell Dennis how to play football any more than you tell Joe Root how to play spin. Perfection is too rare in life to be tampered with.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying we should have stuck with Eddie Nketiah.....
We all love Gary Neville here, don't we. He was a lunchtime guest on TMS years ago and spoke very well about how playing lower league club cricket in Manchester was crucial to his success as a footballer.
He explained that he was fifteen or sixteen and a real England test prospect. But these old fellows he played with, factory workers, office drones etc. absolutely lived for their cricket at the weekend and simply did not care a fig for the development of a future England star opener. They'd worked all week in their ****ty jobs just for the weekend, they paid their subs and petrol money and bought all their own kit and just wanted to play cricket and, most importantly, win at cricket.
So despite being a child, if he made a mistake, they would beat the **** out of him back in the pavillion (although, in fairness, that almost certainly would have occurred to them whether he dropped any catches or not). Anyway, it taught him that despite never having been the most gifted footballer, he always took the whole thing very seriously and gave everything he could. It made him grow up."Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Comment

Comment