Announcement

Collapse

Software update

We'll be upgrading our forum software over the next few days. As part of this update we will need to prune threads over 12 months old.

Downtime will be kept to a minimum during the upgrade and your usernames and passwords will still work when we are back up and running.

If you have any issues logging in please drop us an email at fmadmin@footymad.net from your registered email address quoting your username and we will help you get sorted.
See more
See less

Martinelli

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by John Bunnell View Post
    I don't think I do. Freddie's first few seasons for us were excellent, definitely better than anything Saka has. He had very good goal & assist numbers in both the invincible season and the double season, so his contribution in two of our best seasons in history is significant.

    The Ljungberg you're describing reminds me of his last two seasons for us where he fell off a cliff in form, but I'm not judging him on that.
    In all competitions...

    Freddie 2001/2- 17 goals, 5 assists
    Freddie 2003/4- 10 goals, 9 assists

    Saka 20212- 12 goals, 7 assists
    Saka 2022/3- 14 goals, 12 assists
    Saka 2023/4- 20 goals, 17 assists
    Saka 2024/5- 12 goals, 14 assists

    Overall record, Saka is ahead on goals, miles ahead on assists, from fewer games, and is still only 24.

    The stats only point one way, I'm afraid.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by John Bunnell View Post
      Oh what tosh. Saka's numbers are inflated by penalties. And Freddie had plentiful assists maybe not as good as Saka but he had a load of them.

      There's no way any Arsenal fan can seriously say Saka has done any season better than Ljungberg 2001-02 and 04-05
      And here come the caveats...... assist data below, by the way. But I guess you will say that Saka's are inflated by the excellence of his corners.....

      There is a reason Saka takes penalties and Freddie didn't.... ditto corners.

      Comment


      • #48
        Also, Penalties
        21/22 - 2
        22/23 - 2
        23/24 - 6
        24/25 - 1
        This season - 1

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Peter View Post
          And here come the caveats...... assist data below, by the way. But I guess you will say that Saka's are inflated by the excellence of his corners.....

          There is a reason Saka takes penalties and Freddie didn't.... ditto corners.
          Why have you omitted Freddie's 04/05 season? You know where he won the Invincible trophy? Got 14 goals in about 10 games less than Saka and without penalties.

          It's all very well rubbing one off about stats but Ljungberg is the one who played pivotal roles in our two most successful seasons and has legend status. I suppose Saka helped win us some Community Shields tho eh?

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by John Bunnell View Post
            Why have you omitted Freddie's 04/05 season? You know where he won the Invincible trophy? Got 14 goals in about 10 games less than Saka and without penalties.

            It's all very well rubbing one off about stats but Ljungberg is the one who played pivotal roles in our two most successful seasons and has legend status. I suppose Saka helped win us some Community Shields tho eh?
            *Cough* Invincibles was 03/04

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by John Bunnell View Post
              Why have you omitted Freddie's 04/05 season? You know where he won the Invincible trophy? Got 14 goals in about 10 games less than Saka and without penalties.

              It's all very well rubbing one off about stats but Ljungberg is the one who played pivotal roles in our two most successful seasons and has legend status. I suppose Saka helped win us some Community Shields tho eh?
              I can answer that easily. You said the invincible season. That was 03/04

              If you want 2004/5, here you go: 14 goals, 11 assists. Eclipsed by Saka twice before the age of 22.......

              Words like pivotal and legend dont carry much weight here. Saka is pivotal to everything we do and another word for legend is myth....

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by PSRB View Post
                *Cough* Invincibles was 03/04
                Ahh. I looked at his honours and misread the FA Cup win as Prem. Oops.

                Well there's another honour there!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by 7sisters View Post
                  I think you have your rose tinted glasses on over Ljunberg. He was a great player but Saka?s overall contribution is far higher and at a much younger stage in his development.
                  The frustrating side of Ljungberg were those head down runs along the left channel that invariably led to him running into a cul de sac and getting dispossessed. Saka, at least, can provide a cross from the tightest of spaces, often with two defenders bearing down on him. Ljungberg just ran out of options too often; although, he worked the space better and was always there to stab it home.
                  We?re probably missing a player like him around the box these days.
                  Imagine if B had Bergy playing defence splitting passes into the box so he was 1-on-1 from 15 yards with the ball on his left foot.....

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Peter View Post
                    I can answer that easily. You said the invincible season. That was 03/04

                    If you want 2004/5, here you go: 14 goals, 11 assists. Eclipsed by Saka twice before the age of 22.......

                    Words like pivotal and legend dont carry much weight here. Saka is pivotal to everything we do and another word for legend is myth....
                    Now, now, P, don't get all lefty definitions.

                    Nouns and adjectives.

                    A legend can be a myth.

                    Legendary talent and mythical talent are not the same.

                    {I fully agree with the point you're making, btw. So there's no need to resort to Corbynista jeux des mots.}

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
                      Now, now, P, don't get all lefty definitions.

                      Nouns and adjectives.

                      A legend can be a myth.

                      Legendary talent and mythical talent are not the same.

                      {I fully agree with the point you're making, btw. So there's no need to resort to Corbynista jeux des mots.}
                      I was being playful...

                      If i was going Corbyn on you I would tell you to get on the right side of history...

                      I assume you have at some point thought about what a thoroughly sinister statement that is....

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Peter View Post
                        I was being playful...

                        If i was going Corbyn on you I would tell you to get on the right side of history...

                        I assume you have at some point thought about what a thoroughly sinister statement that is....
                        Very good. But Freddie vs B is the right side's history.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
                          Very good. But Freddie vs B is the right side's history.
                          Nicely done.

                          And stop calling me a ****ing lefty!

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X