VAR is about to f*ck us here again

[WES]

never clear and obvious in a million years.

And it was a pen

[IUFG]

never clear and obvious in a million years.

And it was a pen

Knee on knee contact prior to ball touch.

They **** us off, every time...

[WES]

never clear and obvious in a million years.

And it was a pen

Yup

Is there a stat on VAR over turning decisions by team?

Shirley we?re top of the league

[Peter]

never clear and obvious in a million years.

And it was a pen

Not a second of doubt in my mind which way that would go. Var is hopeless.

[WES]

Knee on knee contact prior to ball touch.

They **** us off, every time...

Eggsactly, contact was before he touched the ball - pen

[Peter]

Eggsactly, contact was before he touched the ball - pen

Well it certainly isnt a clear and obvious error however you look at it.

They should remove that phrase. Refs simply don't know what it means.

[IUFG]

Eggsactly, contact was before he touched the ball - pen

If it looks like a foul. And it is a foul. It is a pelanty. Shirley?

[Peter]

If it looks like a foul. And it is a foul. It is a pelanty. Shirley?

His explanation. The player plays the ball.

Yes, we know that. But he takes the man first you ****ing pillock.

Even the explanation is bull****

[John Bunnell]

The Gyokeres one was a penalty in all. Refs are bent it's nothing to do with VAR it's the bent spastics watching the screens. We need an AI intervention.

[IUFG]

The Gyokeres one was a penalty in all. Refs are bent it's nothing to do with VAR it's the bent spastics watching the screens. We need an AI intervention.

It was a foul, but not enough of a foul, apparently...

[Peter]

It was a foul, but not enough of a foul, apparently...

Not a clear and obvious error, I assume..

[IUFG]

Not a clear and obvious error, I assume..

I suppose it is just like when they do, or don't, make player take throw-ins from the correct place.

It just seems that when they interpret every decision that could go in our favour, it rarely does.

[Peter]

I suppose it is just like when they do, or don't, make player take throw-ins from the correct place.

It just seems that when they interpret every decision that could go in our favour, it rarely does.

I thought the penalty was generous but rhat doesn't make it an error. Really poor use of var, again.

[IUFG]

I thought the penalty was generous but rhat doesn't make it an error. Really poor use of var, again.

How did Fulham have an XG of 0.44 with ZERO shots on target?

Or are these stats *******s? ��

[redgunamo]

I thought the penalty was generous but rhat doesn't make it an error. Really poor use of var, again.

Generous, perhaps. But I've always felt that decisions should punish, anyway, NOT reward, brainless play.