Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Timber's goal should have stood. VAR said check complete and meant it was a goal.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Timber's goal should have stood. VAR said check complete and meant it was a goal.

    The ref took it as meaning it was offside.

    And knowing this VAR just let him continue with a FK against Timber.

    So that's 2 pens and a goal that have all gone against us that were wrong.

    Get rid of VAR. At least we could have put the goal being disallowed down to the lino getting a tight call wrong. But to have it checked to the millimetre, found it was a goal, and then human error meaning it's disallowed? Madness. Madness.

  • #2
    And now they say Haarland's winner today should have remained offside as the ref said, before VAR over-ruled him.

    3 decisions against us, one for City, all in 4 matchweeks. Will this even itself out, will they just stop happening, or will we keep getting the ****ty end of the stick?

    Comment


    • #3
      Watching united fans completely lose their **** over perceived injustices is pretty funny tho. Bunch of cvnts finally getting their own medicine.

      Comment

      Working...
      X