Announcement

Collapse

Software update

We'll be upgrading our forum software over the next few days. As part of this update we will need to prune threads over 12 months old.

Downtime will be kept to a minimum during the upgrade and your usernames and passwords will still work when we are back up and running.

If you have any issues logging in please drop us an email at fmadmin@footymad.net from your registered email address quoting your username and we will help you get sorted.
See more
See less

Gyokeres has been the breakdown of everything. Absolutely abysmal.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gyokeres has been the breakdown of everything. Absolutely abysmal.

    Eze good. But goodness me get Gyokeres off asap

  • #2
    Originally posted by Rich View Post
    Eze good. But goodness me get Gyokeres off asap
    He's been poor. He is not alone.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Peter View Post
      He's been poor. He is not alone.
      Eze, Zubimendi, the defence has been good. Gyokeres has caused all of our intricate play to fall apart. The worst I?ve seen him for us.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thankfully the boss got him off. Frustrating as Havertz will need to play 90 against City anyway. Hopefully he has the fitness.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Rich View Post
          Eze, Zubimendi, the defence has been good. Gyokeres has caused all of our intricate play to fall apart. The worst I?ve seen him for us.
          Madueke is a ****ing clown.

          Across the board it has been another nothing performance. Eze has done quite well.

          Unless we concede, we have about 5-10 minutes before we retreat behind the ball and start wasting time.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Rich View Post
            Eze, Zubimendi, the defence has been good. Gyokeres has caused all of our intricate play to fall apart. The worst I?ve seen him for us.
            ?55m for him. I?m thinking ?40m to ?45m to move him on ?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Peter View Post
              Madueke is a ****ing clown.

              Across the board it has been another nothing performance. Eze has done quite well.

              Unless we concede, we have about 5-10 minutes before we retreat behind the ball and start wasting time.
              At least he tries to make something happen.

              Game management isn?t a bad thing.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by 7sisters View Post
                ?55m for him. I?m thinking ?40m to ?45m to move him on ?
                'All of our intricate play'.... that's about three instances......

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by 7sisters View Post
                  ?55m for him. I?m thinking ?40m to ?45m to move him on ?
                  His wages are cheap and he offers an option against the bottom 6. Worth keeping for that but if an offer for 35m+ comes then we will surely take it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Rich View Post
                    At least he tries to make something happen.

                    Game management isn?t a bad thing.
                    He's injured now and off.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Peter View Post
                      He's injured now and off.
                      Going to need to play Jesus left wing and Martinelli right wing.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Rich View Post
                        His wages are cheap and he offers an option against the bottom 6. Worth keeping for that but if an offer for 35m+ comes then we will surely take it.
                        No, we wont.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Rich View Post
                          Going to need to play Jesus left wing and Martinelli right wing.
                          Trossard or Dowman.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Peter View Post
                            No, we wont.
                            We ****ing better as he is nowhere near the required quality. And hurts our style of play.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Rich View Post
                              We ****ing better as he is nowhere near the required quality. And hurts our style of play.
                              You are massively overreacting to a bad 55 minutes where he touched the ball about 7 or 8 times.

                              Identifying him as the ting that hurts our style of play is ridiculous.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X