Announcement

Collapse

Software update

We'll be upgrading our forum software over the next few days. As part of this update we will need to prune threads over 12 months old.

Downtime will be kept to a minimum during the upgrade and your usernames and passwords will still work when we are back up and running.

If you have any issues logging in please drop us an email at fmadmin@footymad.net from your registered email address quoting your username and we will help you get sorted.
See more
See less

One thing I don't understand is why they couldn't play advantage when Gabby was

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • One thing I don't understand is why they couldn't play advantage when Gabby was

    through just to show the red card.

    Remember when Gabby got two yellows in the same move? He could play advantage and show the card afterwards.

    Maybe it's because if we lose possession and he has a hand in a counter-attack leading to a goal, he shouldn't have been on the pitch. But if Gabby did lose possession, he could simply blow up, show the red and have an uncontested drop ball to give the ball back to Chelsea.

    I think it should be like rugby. Play advantage, if there's no advantage, go back for the foul. It would make the game more interesting and fairer.

    On a side issue, I do think they need to stop all the holding at corners. We do it loads, but if everyone else does, then we have to.

    I think we could have given away a couple of pens, but both were checked and deemed non-fouls. But for Hinchappy's og, it looked like a rugby scrum at the near post. I wish this would stop.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    through just to show the red card.

    Remember when Gabby got two yellows in the same move? He could play advantage and show the card afterwards.

    Maybe it's because if we lose possession and he has a hand in a counter-attack leading to a goal, he shouldn't have been on the pitch. But if Gabby did lose possession, he could simply blow up, show the red and have an uncontested drop ball to give the ball back to Chelsea.

    I think it should be like rugby. Play advantage, if there's no advantage, go back for the foul. It would make the game more interesting and fairer.

    On a side issue, I do think they need to stop all the holding at corners. We do it loads, but if everyone else does, then we have to.

    I think we could have given away a couple of pens, but both were checked and deemed non-fouls. But for Hinchappy's og, it looked like a rugby scrum at the near post. I wish this would stop.
    He should have played advantage. He just blew too early. Did the same in fhe first half when we had a break on.

    Think the Rice handball was a 50/50. Couldn't have complained but if it was the other way around, I wouldn't expect to be given it.

    Comment

    Working...
    X