Announcement

Collapse

Software update

We'll be upgrading our forum software over the next few days. As part of this update we will need to prune threads over 12 months old.

Downtime will be kept to a minimum during the upgrade and your usernames and passwords will still work when we are back up and running.

If you have any issues logging in please drop us an email at fmadmin@footymad.net from your registered email address quoting your username and we will help you get sorted.
See more
See less

Gary Neville is being ridiculous

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by WES View Post
    Yes, the narrative that odious little paddy Given was peddling on MOTD was nonsense.

    If they score there we still go on to win, we were that much better.

    I think Shay Given might be the only Irishman I genuinely hate
    Oh yes, he really doesn't like us. You can see in his face how hard he finds saying anything positive about us.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by WES View Post
      Yes, the narrative that odious little paddy Given was peddling on MOTD was nonsense.

      If they score there we still go on to win, we were that much better.

      I think Shay Given might be the only Irishman I genuinely hate
      Geordie poison. Finds it way in somehow.

      Awful people. Up the mackems

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Peter View Post
        Can't speak for all of them but my friends simply cannot handle Arsenal's resurgence. They despise Arteta and everyone else at the club.

        It's really just envy, but there is a distinct lack of class. Piling on me after the Wolves games is not the act of a friend. I would NEVER do that to anyone. It's unspeakably childish.

        Had weeks of **** about Thomas Partey as well.
        I don't get that. I know their historic rivalry was the NW derby with the Scousers, but it must hurt being the second best team in their city.

        Actually, thinking about it, is it that City have just bought it? All their trinkets will have 115 asterisks, but if we win, we'll have done it far and square like Fergie and Wenger etc.

        Genuine question, P, and I haven't thought it through myself.

        Sperz get bought buy some petro-dictatorship and spend billions each year after openly bribing the FA, PL, Uefa etc.

        It's them against a resurgent Man U {managed by some former player you hate as much as I hate Neville} for the title. Who do you want to win?

        I still don't want Sperz to win. I don't care about the asterisks. I don't care ManU pull further away from us in all time titles.

        Though I can sort of see where they're coming from. If City with everything then us, Mancs and LFC are where we've always been. We're equals. Doesn't matter if one is 2nd, one is 5th and one is 17th in the grand scheme of things.

        But kids in the playground will be choosing City over Utd. They'll lose their City. Surely that means more? How can they cheers for their City rivals?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
          I don't get that. I know their historic rivalry was the NW derby with the Scousers, but it must hurt being the second best team in their city.

          Actually, thinking about it, is it that City have just bought it? All their trinkets will have 115 asterisks, but if we win, we'll have done it far and square like Fergie and Wenger etc.

          Genuine question, P, and I haven't thought it through myself.

          Sperz get bought buy some petro-dictatorship and spend billions each year after openly bribing the FA, PL, Uefa etc.

          It's them against a resurgent Man U {managed by some former player you hate as much as I hate Neville} for the title. Who do you want to win?

          I still don't want Sperz to win. I don't care about the asterisks. I don't care ManU pull further away from us in all time titles.

          Though I can sort of see where they're coming from. If City with everything then us, Mancs and LFC are where we've always been. We're equals. Doesn't matter if one is 2nd, one is 5th and one is 17th in the grand scheme of things.

          But kids in the playground will be choosing City over Utd. They'll lose their City. Surely that means more? How can they cheers for their City rivals?
          United still have far more sway than City in Manchester. Both my girls would be United fans if I hadn't stepped in

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by PSRB View Post
            United still have far more sway than City in Manchester. Both my girls would be United fans if I hadn't stepped in
            That's some top class parenting right there, P

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
              I don't get that. I know their historic rivalry was the NW derby with the Scousers, but it must hurt being the second best team in their city.

              Actually, thinking about it, is it that City have just bought it? All their trinkets will have 115 asterisks, but if we win, we'll have done it far and square like Fergie and Wenger etc.

              Genuine question, P, and I haven't thought it through myself.

              Sperz get bought buy some petro-dictatorship and spend billions each year after openly bribing the FA, PL, Uefa etc.

              It's them against a resurgent Man U {managed by some former player you hate as much as I hate Neville} for the title. Who do you want to win?

              I still don't want Sperz to win. I don't care about the asterisks. I don't care ManU pull further away from us in all time titles.

              Though I can sort of see where they're coming from. If City with everything then us, Mancs and LFC are where we've always been. We're equals. Doesn't matter if one is 2nd, one is 5th and one is 17th in the grand scheme of things.

              But kids in the playground will be choosing City over Utd. They'll lose their City. Surely that means more? How can they cheers for their City rivals?
              Not even a question. Anyone but Spurs. Literally anyone.

              But then I am a North Londoner who supports Arsenal because my grandfather did, and his father before him.

              It is different. These guys are cockney reds. Not saying they aren't genuine fans, but they dont get the Mancunian aspect of it. They dont know what it means, as they say.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by PSRB View Post
                United still have far more sway than City in Manchester. Both my girls would be United fans if I hadn't stepped in
                Bloody right!

                My nephew supports Everton, because his father does.

                It is a patriarchal line. There should be no arguments about that

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Peter View Post
                  Bloody right!

                  My nephew supports Everton, because his father does.

                  It is a patriarchal line. There should be no arguments about that
                  My eldest used to wind me up that she would support spurs because she liked Hurri Kane....thankfully she was just being a prick.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by PSRB View Post
                    United still have far more sway than City in Manchester. Both my girls would be United fans if I hadn't stepped in
                    If City's dominance went on for another whole generation would it stay that way?

                    Does everyone in Manchester already have a team so it gets passed down, and Manchester will always be mostly MU?

                    I know their historic rivalry with LFC but did they never have one with City? I don't remembering the Manc derby being "friendly" in the way the Merseyside one was.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Peter View Post
                      Not even a question. Anyone but Spurs. Literally anyone.

                      But then I am a North Londoner who supports Arsenal because my grandfather did, and his father before him.

                      It is different. These guys are cockney reds. Not saying they aren't genuine fans, but they dont get the Mancunian aspect of it. They dont know what it means, as they say.
                      Gotcha now.

                      So basically they care more about their rivalry with their fellow Londoners than they do about the club's historic city rivalry. That explains it, I suppose.

                      But I do think they are missing something. They're supporting ManU wanting to be the biggest in London, not in Manchester.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
                        If City's dominance went on for another whole generation would it stay that way?

                        Does everyone in Manchester already have a team so it gets passed down, and Manchester will always be mostly MU?

                        I know their historic rivalry with LFC but did they never have one with City? I don't remembering the Manc derby being "friendly" in the way the Merseyside one was.
                        Oh it's certainly not 'friendly'. Maybe because I live in Trafford I know far more United fans than City fans.

                        The ones wanting City to win the title, I think is because it deflects from how terrible they are. I think they've just accepted that they're playing 2nd fiddle to City but still think they're on a level with us.

                        Let's not forget they got relegated in the 70's and were as ****e as they are now until Fergie arrived but still had a huge fanbase when I was growing up in Surrey

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by PSRB View Post
                          Oh it's certainly not 'friendly'. Maybe because I live in Trafford I know far more United fans than City fans.

                          The ones wanting City to win the title, I think is because it deflects from how terrible they are. I think they've just accepted that they're playing 2nd fiddle to City but still think they're on a level with us.

                          Let's not forget they got relegated in the 70's and were as ****e as they are now until Fergie arrived but still had a huge fanbase when I was growing up in Surrey
                          The money is relevant, in my experience. As City simply bought the league, they feel it doesn't count. When THEY could outspend everyone that was fine, as it was football-derived income.

                          They have convinced themselves that City destroyed football and good, honest clubs like them cant compete. So when Liverpool win it, they hate it. Us winning it is somehow worse.

                          They genuinely believe that every team tries harder against them than against anyone else

                          Pretty funny, really

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Peter View Post
                            The money is relevant, in my experience. As City simply bought the league, they feel it doesn't count. When THEY could outspend everyone that was fine, as it was football-derived income.

                            They have convinced themselves that City destroyed football and good, honest clubs like them cant compete. So when Liverpool win it, they hate it. Us winning it is somehow worse.

                            They genuinely believe that every team tries harder against them than against anyone else

                            Pretty funny, really
                            I hate Chelsea more than City on this front, City's owners just saw what the Russian gangster had done and thought we'll have a bit of that as well.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by PSRB View Post
                              I hate Chelsea more than City on this front, City's owners just saw what the Russian gangster had done and thought we'll have a bit of that as well.
                              I agree. But I also think it is wrong to deny the football achievement.

                              Yes, city can outspend everyone by a mile, and yes they are cheating.

                              But what Pep has achieved cannot be achieved just with money. I think you can still applaud the work, even if you despise the way the club have treated the game.

                              That really ****ing winds them up

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Peter View Post
                                I agree. But I also think it is wrong to deny the football achievement.

                                Yes, city can outspend everyone by a mile, and yes they are cheating.

                                But what Pep has achieved cannot be achieved just with money. I think you can still applaud the work, even if you despise the way the club have treated the game.

                                That really ****ing winds them up
                                It's a bit nonsense that they had a few injuries in December/January and can just casually drop ?100m+ fixing those issues with significantly better players

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X