I think people are playing fast and loose with the whole 'nonce' thing. Epstein clearly liked 'em a bit too young, but they were all the right side of puberty as far as I'm aware. For me, that isn't proper nonceing. It's more a rather unfortunate predilection that happens to place him the wrong side of the somewhat arbitrary laws different states have about this sort of thing. If he were a gay he'd be a pederast rather than a peedo. We need another term for what he was.
I don't actually consider sexual activity with a post pubescent person to be paédophilic.
I see even The Telegraph is spitting the term "child rapist" around when referring to Epstein which isn't doing HRH The Kunt of York any favours. Odd, given that they are usually at the vanguard of toadying up to the lizards.
I am rather enjoying watching this repellent man being hung out to dry.