Click here to join the Arsenal World community

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 54

Thread: Seems to be a lot of discussion around Arteta's future

  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman View Post
    If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well It were done quickly.
    I couldn?t help noticing Iraola serving notice to Jack it in over at Bournemouth.
    Behind the scenes talks at The Goring, hopefully.

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by 7sisters View Post
    I couldn?t help noticing Iraola serving notice to Jack it in over at Bournemouth.
    Behind the scenes talks at The Goring, hopefully.
    We would be level on points at the top of the table with 5 games to go. 5 winnable games. You don't sack your manager then and you certainly don't expect that some other poor sod can come in and improve things in a week.

    You wait until he blows it with 5 more pitiful performances and then you sling him out on his ear the day after the final game- or the minute it is mathematically finished.

    Personally, I would sack him in the summer even in if we did win the league, but that is just me

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by pjlincs View Post
    That was then. This is today's Guardian:
    'with Manchester City breathing down their necks again and major doubts about when talisman Bukayo Saka will play again due to an achilles issue' plus 'and, in the absence of Saka for the foreseeable future'.
    Apparently instead of bringing your lunch it's going to be 'No fear, pure fire' tonight :shrugs:
    **** Sake.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    **** Sake.
    At least we know why Saka has been playing so badly for months. He has been injured, and Arteta has kept playing him, running him into the ****ing ground.

    No surprise that Rice is now ****ed.

    Piss-poor management.

  5. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    At least we know why Saka has been playing so badly for months. He has been injured, and Arteta has kept playing him, running him into the ****ing ground.

    No surprise that Rice is now ****ed.

    Piss-poor management.
    Not management is it, silly man. The medical team advise the coach who can/cannot play.

    Apparently it was England's medics who identified him as being in the red zone.

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    Not management is it, silly man. The medical team advise the coach who can/cannot play.

    Apparently it was England's medics who identified him as being in the red zone.
    The medical team advise the coach and the coach makes the decision. Of course it is down to him.

    They tell him a player is in the red zone. They dont tell him they cannot play.

    If he can get them out there with the hope they can make it through 70 minutes, he does it. And this is the result.

    And if the medical team are that ****ing useless......well, need I say more?

  7. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    The medical team advise the coach and the coach makes the decision. Of course it is down to him.

    They tell him a player is in the red zone. They dont tell him they cannot play.

    If he can get them out there with the hope they can make it through 70 minutes, he does it. And this is the result.

    And if the medical team are that ****ing useless......well, need I say more?
    Well really that just emphasises the threadbare nature of our attacking options.

    A must address in the summer.

  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    Well really that just emphasises the threadbare nature of our attacking options.

    A must address in the summer.
    We addressed it last summer. We spent 170 million on new forwards. We have loads of attacking options. Unfortunately we dont really do any attacking other than controlled pressure.

    I doubt we can afford to do it again. And I doubt it would make any difference.

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    We addressed it last summer. We spent 170 million on new forwards. We have loads of attacking options. Unfortunately we dont really do any attacking other than controlled pressure.

    I doubt we can afford to do it again. And I doubt it would make any difference.
    170m barely buys you one good forward these days. What we bought was depth (which was badly lacking last season with Jesus and Havertz missing the whole season - give or take).

    This summer is about adding superstar quality. The same quality that Man City, United, Liverpool, Chelsea all have.

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    170m barely buys you one good forward these days. What we bought was depth (which was badly lacking last season with Jesus and Havertz missing the whole season - give or take).

    This summer is about adding superstar quality. The same quality that Man City, United, Liverpool, Chelsea all have.
    What superstar attacking quality did City, United or Chelsea pay more than 100 million for?

    Haaland, Cherki, Marmoush, Semenyo and Doku....

    They cost roughly the same in total as Havertz, Gyokeres, Madueke, Jesus and Eze.

    So if they have world class attacking talent and we dont, it isnt because of money. We must just be **** at spending it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •