Originally Posted by
Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
What's the point in giving the young Jock a medical if he's injured?
And why are we buying a LB when we have two of those but just one RB who's both injured and injury-prone?
The season before, when we had a manager who knew how to use full-backs in a 4-4-2, Nacho and Kola scored 11 between them.
So we'll start the season with 3 LBs and no RB. We have a whole host of young kids who can play MF or wide attacker - AMN, Willock, Nelson, Smith Rowe, John Jules, Saka etc - but none who can play FB or CH. Yet we sign a winger and an on-loan MF. And now a LB.
It's a bit like the cricket - loads of sexy sloggers, no-one that can play a forward defensive.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote