Originally Posted by Burney Not wrong. Outside work, one may do as one wishes, but in the workplace, the employer gets to set the rules. disagree on this occasion
Originally Posted by Monty92 disagree on this occasion Is that it?
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas But would they ask a Sikh to remove his turbin? or ask monty to remove his little hat? Well that's the key, y'see? If you do it for the Allans, you have to do it for all, otherwise it's discriminatory. Which, of course, is why it won't amount to anything.
Originally Posted by World's End Stella Provided that those rules do not violate the basic human rights to which we are all entitled. An important distinction, I think. And - sadly - I'm with Monty on this one. There's no human rights that mean you're allowed to dress as you please on someone else's dollar, I'm afraid.
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas Is that it? IM ON the phone to a client
Originally Posted by Monty92 IM ON the phone to a client Ask him what he thinks about it.
Originally Posted by Monty92 IM ON the phone to a client that reminds me I should do some work.
Originally Posted by World's End Stella Provided that those rules do not violate the basic human rights to which we are all entitled. An important distinction, I think. And - sadly - I'm with Monty on this one. What human rights? The right to wear what you want or the employers right to set what you wear??
Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar
Originally Posted by Monty92 Wrong, imo. A policy can now legally ban ALL political, philosophical or religious signs, m. including your yarmulke
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
Originally Posted by IUFG A policy can now legally ban ALL political, philosophical or religious signs, m. including your yarmulke But it presumably cannot allow some and ban others?
Forum Rules