Reply With Quoteand they ****ed the case against Leicester.Originally Posted by 7sisters
Let’s hope they rediscover their backbone for the City hearing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football...s/c0rwy2z7d2eo
and they ****ed the case against Leicester.
You have to wonder how incompetent Everton's bosses and lawyers were/are.
Just a reminder - some people on here wanted Moshiri and Usmanov in charge at Arsenal
You have to wonder how incompetent Everton's bosses and lawyers were/are.
Just a reminder - some people on here wanted Moshiri and Usmanov in charge at Arsenalwhilst not perfect, the Kroenke's have actually been very good owners. They seem genuinely invested in the health of the club and doing what's best for the long-term......apart from the Super League*
*That said, I was always of the opinion that had it happened it would have been better to be part of it than left behind.
The shift with the Kroenke's seem to have happened in the last 5 years, across their sports holdings. Their other sides started winning as well. Wonder if it is to do with the son taking more control. They have certainly been putting money in at Arsenal.
*That said, I was always of the opinion that had it happened it would have been better to be part of it than left behind.
The younger fans would probably have loved a sugar daddy but us older types know it is a term circus. I would rather be Spurs than Chelsea. It's less embarrassing, and that is saying something
I still dont see how that helps. Even with their unique accounting models that is an 89 million quid loss this year. Are they claiming they didn't lose more than 15 million quid across the two years before that? And what happens next year? That billion pound plus they've spent has to appear in the books somewhere for the next 8 years.
It’ll be interesting to see how Chelsea get on against UEFA, in the event they qualify for CL qualification, as it appears they’ll be unable to use the Hotel sale.
*That said, I was always of the opinion that had it happened it would have been better to be part of it than left behind.
Not sure about the US teams but Stan getting full control is when the difference was made. Maybe that's why he felt more confident to put Josh in charge. Have to say Josh seems like a nicer character and doing a good jobThe shift with the Kroenke's seem to have happened in the last 5 years, across their sports holdings. Their other sides started winning as well. Wonder if it is to do with the son taking more control. They have certainly been putting money in at Arsenal.
The younger fans would probably have loved a sugar daddy but us older types know it is a term circus. I would rather be Spurs than Chelsea. It's less embarrassing, and that is saying something
He certainly seems to have a relationship with Edu, which is very useful. And while the previous structure they put in place was a bit of a disaster, at least they realised and dismantled it pretty quickly. We've watched other owners spend years doing the wrong thing.
Pretty difficult to find anything to complain about in the last few years
You seem to make it look easyHe certainly seems to have a relationship with Edu, which is very useful. And while the previous structure they put in place was a bit of a disaster, at least they realised and dismantled it pretty quickly. We've watched other owners spend years doing the wrong thing.
Pretty difficult to find anything to complain about in the last few years
Posting Permissions