This Harvey Weinstein fellow; he's clearly something of a knob.

[Burney]

You see, you've added the visible erection there, h. No one mentioned such an erection. The erection is, as ever, only in your head.

So far, all we've heard is from women he's asked for a massage, masturbated into a pot plant in front of or greeted in his dressing gown. We've heard nothing to my knowledge of him slipping anyone the fattener, have we?

[World's End Stella]

So far, all we've heard is from women he's asked for a massage, masturbated into a pot plant in front of or greeted in his dressing gown. We've heard nothing to my knowledge of him slipping anyone the fattener, have we?

You think someone propositioning someone on a professional basis shouldn't be punishable by - at the very least - dismissal?

So your daughter applies for a job somewhere and the interviewer makes it clear he would like sex in exchange for the job offer and that's fine? She can either acquiesce or not take the job and just get on with it?

[Pokster]

You think someone propositioning someone on a professional basis shouldn't be punishable by - at the very least - dismissal?

So your daughter applies for a job somewhere and the interviewer makes it clear he would like sex in exchange for the job offer and that's fine? She can either acquiesce or not take the job and just get on with it?

A brokers in London interviewed a girl for a dealing job, she was asked if a client asked for a BJ what would she do.... she replied "it all depends how much brokerage he is paying".

She got the job

[Burney]

You think someone propositioning someone on a professional basis shouldn't be punishable by - at the very least - dismissal?

So your daughter applies for a job somewhere and the interviewer makes it clear he would like sex in exchange for the job offer and that's fine? She can either acquiesce or not take the job and just get on with it?

Sorry, but where did I say I didn’t think it was grounds for dismissal?

[World's End Stella]

Sorry, but where did I say I didn’t think it was grounds for dismissal?

You didn't - but you clearly played down the significance of his behavior in both your posts on this thread.

What he's done deserves dismissal and possibly incarceration.

[Sir C]

You didn't - but you clearly played down the significance of his behavior in both your posts on this thread.

What he's done deserves dismissal and possibly incarceration.

What, wearing a dressing gown?

[World's End Stella]

What, wearing a dressing gown?

No, attempting to force women into having sex with him in order to further their careers.

Assuming it's proven, of course.

[Sir C]

No, attempting to force women into having sex with him in order to further their careers.

Assuming it's proven, of course.

Wearing a dressing gown isn't the same as trying to force someone to have sex with you, w.

[Burney]

You didn't - but you clearly played down the significance of his behavior in both your posts on this thread.

What he's done deserves dismissal and possibly incarceration.

No, I didn’t. I expressed my complete lack of surprise or outrage and some irritation at the way in cases like this that accusation immediately seems to magically transform into fact.

[World's End Stella]

No, I didn’t. I expressed my complete lack of surprise or outrage and some irritation at the way in cases like this that accusation immediately seems to magically transform into fact.

I expect that transformation into fact might have something to do with the fact that so many women have come forward, that people within the industry have commented on how many stories they had heard about him and that he hasn't in any way denied it.

It can become not fact pretty quickly by him simply saying 'it never happened'.