It's not even political correctness. It's hard electoral calculation. These people already wield enough political clout to divert public discourse away from topics that paint them in a bad light. As their demographic strength gets greater, there will be much worse to follow as they start to set the public agenda.Originally Posted by Monty92
Yes, but the tacit support they receive from your average liberal is, I believe, in the name of political correctness rather than electoral calculation. When a liberal in the street doesn't speak out against Pakistani grooming gangs, it's not because they worry about it losing Labour the next election by alienating Asian voters. They're just scared of being called racist or aligning themselves with individuals and parties that their Facebook friends deem beyond the pale.
Of course. But they're just the easily-cowed useful idiots. It's scumbag MPs across the House who look at their seat's demographics before deciding how they feel about mass rape of underage girls for whom I reserve my most vicious condemnation.
Sarah Champion herself has also shown her true colours, despite her commendable response after the Newcastle convictions, when she said she'd been awake all night thinking about all of these girls who had been raped and enough was enough, we have to face the reality of where this problem is coming from.
Now she's effectively been forced out of her job. So if she truly cared about those young white girls that she claimed lost her a night's sleep, she would be all over the press, condemning the fact she's been forced out, and being more vocal than ever about the whole issue.
But of course, the chances of her doing so are zero, and she will keep a low profile and wait to be offered another job within the Labour party.
Hopefully she will save it all up for the weekend and speak out on the Andrew Marr show
10 characters? Pile of cund.
Give her a ****ing chance. She said one thing and got fired for it, watching the political class close its ranks.
Only fair to let her have a think about her next move.
Anyway, you are missing a crucial point here. A local councillor in Newcastle (Asian) explained that asking the Asian community to take responsibility for this is like asking the white community to take responsibility for Jimmy Saville.
Even I wanted to smack the smug **** in the face.
But you won't admit it's a Muslim problem
Its committed by asian men, most of whom are Muslims. It strongly suggests that there is some issue with how members of these communities view young white women (as they are always the target).But you won't admit it's a Muslim problem
Without question, it is an issues for these communities to address. Refusing to do so, refusing to even accept that there is an issue, is bull****. Its also a tremendously inhumane response to see this as a race issue and ignore the multitude of victims.
The whole situation becomes rather difficult when you refer to it as a 'muslim problem' or refer to the perpetrators as Pakistani when plenty of them aren't. It is also rather difficult to refer to a single community which doesn't actually exist.
I have no problem saying that the members of these gangs seem to be almost exclusively muslim. I know you want to go back down the path of blaming the entire religion for it. Would I help if I told you that was exactly the wrong thing to do if you are actually interested in stopping it happening?
If Jimmy Savile had selectively and systematically targeted girls of a different race, culture and religion because of those factors, the stupid cùnts who come out with this argument might have a point.
As it is, they don't.
You could also argue that the white community has dealt very decisively with the whole 'celebrities abusing children' issue. Some would say they went too far in chasing historic allegations.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote