Slightly :deviant: behaviour last night, watched the women's footy

[Peter]

They had to bring the boundaries in for girl cricket. Mind you, I remember watching it before they did and there were literally no boundaries ever. Jesus it was dull.

Women are smaller, slower, weaker, less aggressive, less co-ordinated and have poorer visual acuity and spacial awareness than men. Of course their bloody sports are rubbish compared to the male versions!

These are simply biological facts. Why is it even controversial to state this?

Because women are also unreasonable ****s and have been convinced that they are as good (arguably better) as men at everything.

My Sunday team had a 20 minute kick about with a good women's team. They couldn't get near us. It was a joke.

[PSRB]

Because women are also unreasonable ****s and have been convinced that they are as good (arguably better) as men at everything.

My Sunday team had a 20 minute kick about with a good women's team. They couldn't get near us. It was a joke.

As I've said on here many times before, the only Women's sports that are just as enjoyable to watch as the Mens is Skiing (Downhill, Super G, Giant Slalom and Slalom), not the tricks stuff as they're just not powerful enough to pull of the properly cool stuff

[Burney]

As I've said on here many times before, the only Women's sports that are just as enjoyable to watch as the Mens is Skiing (Downhill, Super G, Giant Slalom and Slalom), not the tricks stuff as they're just not powerful enough to pull of the properly cool stuff

Yes, but with skiing, gravity is really doing all the hard yards as far as speed is concerned.

[Burney]

Because women are also unreasonable ****s and have been convinced that they are as good (arguably better) as men at everything.

My Sunday team had a 20 minute kick about with a good women's team. They couldn't get near us. It was a joke.

Yes, unfortunately, people have become convinced that equality means ignoring demonstrable biological realities in favour of dogma.

And women always point to outliers as though they were the norm. "What about Serena Williams?', they'll say - ignoring the fact that a/ Serena Williams is a physical freak and b/ that even despite that freakery, she would lose to the top 100 male players.

[Monty92]

Yes, unfortunately, people have become convinced that equality means ignoring demonstrable biological realities in favour of dogma.

And women always point to outliers as though they were the norm. "What about Serena Williams?', they'll say - ignoring the fact that a/ Serena Williams is a physical freak and b/ that even despite that freakery, she would lose to the top 100 male players.

Actually both Willams sisters got battered by the fella ranked 203 on the ATP circuit back in 1998. They had previously said they could beat any man ranked above 200, but after their meeting with reality they revised that number to 350.

[Burney]

Actually both Willams sisters got battered by the fella ranked 203 on the ATP circuit back in 1998. They had previously said they could beat the man ranked 200, but after their introduction to reality they revised that number to 350.

Really? Oh, dear.

Just looked it up. He warmed up with 'a round of golf and a couple of shandies'.

https://www.theguardian.com/observer...543962,00.html

[Monty92]

Really? Oh, dear.

Just looked it up. He warmed up with 'a round of golf and a couple of shandies'.

https://www.theguardian.com/observer...543962,00.html

John McEnroe got in trouble a couple of weeks ago for describing Serena (in glowing terms) as the best women's tennis player ever. He was questioned by the interviewer as to why he couldn't just say she's the best tennis player ever and he replied "errr, because she'd be about 700 on the men's circuit"

Cue the accusations of sexism.

[Ash]

He was questioned by the interviewer as to why he couldn't just say she's the best tennis player ever and he replied "errr, because she'd be about 700 on the men's circuit"

Maybe he should have said "Because she's not had to play Roger Federer"

[Monty92]

Maybe he should have said "Because she's not had to play Roger Federer"

But the argument is that because Serena has won more grand slams than any other player in history, male or female, it is only right to describe her as the best tennis player ever.

I don't particularly have a problem with that.

[Ash]

Actually both Willams sisters got battered by the fella ranked 203 on the ATP circuit back in 1998. They had previously said they could beat any man ranked above 200, but after their meeting with reality they revised that number to 350.

EDIT: Doh! Didn't read the whole thread.

John McEnroe got into a bit of trouble the other week for suggesting that in the mens game they would be ranked about six or seven hundred. I didn't hear that 'thing in Australia' being mentioned in the shítstorm. JMac did say in his defence "Am I not allowed to have an opinion?".