Well....duh.Originally Posted by Peter
Of course they do. They mostly voted for him to annoy the sort of people who'd be annoyed by him becoming President. And that is as good a reason as any to elect someone President if you ask me.
I'll be honest: I'd have voted for him if I'd been a Yanqui.
The other option was hardly golden either.
Yes, a fact that seems to have been widely ignored
You can't vote for old women who poo themselves and keep falling over, ffs!
apLGbg9_700b.jpg
It is a dreadful reason for voting for someone. Wanting to keep the opposing candidate out is a perfectly good reason though. I suspect this explains the majority of voting on both sides of this election. Two of the most divisive and despised candidates in history.
There are no bad reasons to vote for someone, p. Because, even if the reason seems frivolous or superficial, the fact that you are reduced to such frivolity and superficiality is in itself a legitimate verdict on the choices one is being offered.
I'll be saving these little gnomic quotes of yours for the morning after Jezza moves into number 10 and you're on here spitting feathers b.
You're confusing whether I like something with whether or not I can empathise with the reasons for someone doing that thing, h.
No, it isn't. your own frivolity and superficiality is not necessarily a reaction to circumstance. There is every chance you are simply a superficial ****.
wanting to cause trouble, as someone else has suggested, is a perfectly good reason.
Arguably, that's the whole point of living in a civilised country; so everyone can simply be a superficial ****.
Even you
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote