That is what she has done essentially, yes. I quote:
"My argument was that when comparing 21st C century fascists and communists their very different goals are morally relevant"
So basically: Fascists kill people because they're evil. Communists do it because they're good. Either way, millions die.'
You don't need to be either of these things though to happily kill people in huge quantities. Madeline Albright, centre-left, thought the death via her sanctions of half-a-million Iraqi children was 'worth it'. Fluffy ecologist Rachel Carson has arguably killed more than Hitler and Stalin combined. A million deaths from malaria every year since she got DDT banned in 1972. And still her book Silent Spring has a hand-written label of recommendation ("You must read this book") in Waterstones on Gower Street.
I'm not making excuses for Hitler and Stalin but ....
Of course not. I'm not buying the sanctions thing, though, since the alternative means of bringing unpleasant regimes to heel is war - take your pick. You could more justifiably point the finger at those children's government, which preferred them to die than to do what was necessary to stop them dying.
Don't get me started on the crimes of the environmental movement, though. You could also point to the fact that thousands of people across Europe will die this winter due to fuel poverty entirely created by unnecessary, ineffective and meaningless 'green' taxes on fuel.