Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: So what is the deal with Jorge's emergence as a bona fide social justice warrior on

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    Are you taking the píss? This is some sort of joke, right?

    He used to openly admit his admiration of the Soviet Union, for the love of Christ!
    Ok, he was always more than a moderate lefty in terms of his *politics*, but he was also politically incorrect, not impartial to the odd jocular racial or ethnic stereotype, and didn't really strike me as the pearl clutching type at all.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    Ok, he was always more than a moderate lefty in terms of his *politics*, but he was also politically incorrect, not impartial to the odd jocular racial or ethnic stereotype, and didn't really strike me as the pearl clutching type at all.
    Perhaps so, but consider the writhing nest of lefties into which he now pukes his genocide-enabling bile; any deviation from prescribed dogma could see him ejected from the echo chamber and probably twittershamed.

    They're even scared of each other, these maniacs.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    Perhaps so, but consider the writhing nest of lefties into which he now pukes his genocide-enabling bile; any deviation from prescribed dogma could see him ejected from the echo chamber and probably twittershamed.

    They're even scared of each other, these maniacs.
    I was just thinking he would probably be quite embarrassed today by some of the things he posted on here.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    Ok, he was always more than a moderate lefty in terms of his *politics*, but he was also politically incorrect, not impartial to the odd jocular racial or ethnic stereotype, and didn't really strike me as the pearl clutching type at all.
    You thought that someone who casually referred to members of our armed services as 'murderers' was a moderate, mainstream lefty?


  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by World's End Stella View Post
    You thought that someone who casually referred to members of our armed services as 'murderers' was a moderate, mainstream lefty?

    I actually think he is more moderate on Twitter than he was on here

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by World's End Stella View Post
    You thought that someone who casually referred to members of our armed services as 'murderers' was a moderate, mainstream lefty?

    I suspect he was channelling his Irish Republicanism at this time.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by SWv2 View Post
    I suspect he was channelling his Irish Republicanism at this time.

    Thirteen dead!
    Nothing said!
    No more Bloody Sundays!



    and so on

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post

    Thirteen dead!
    Nothing said!
    No more Bloody Sundays!



    and so on
    ‘Nothing said’? Fùckers wouldn’t shut up about it for 40 years.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    ‘Nothing said’? Fùckers wouldn’t shut up about it for 40 years.
    Actually, that reminds me. Speaking of left-footers have you seen Lucy Worsley's programme on The Glorious Revolution? Neither glorious, nor a revolution, was her take on it, which is fair comment, I think, but she did downplay the importance of the Bill of Rights imo. Probably because of her general fawning over royalty, and I suspect a secret papist traitor to boot.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Actually, that reminds me. Speaking of left-footers have you seen Lucy Worsley's programme on The Glorious Revolution? Neither glorious, nor a revolution, was her take on it, which is fair comment, I think, but she did downplay the importance of the Bill of Rights imo. Probably because of her general fawning over royalty, and I suspect a secret papist traitor to boot.
    Yeah, it’s hardly a new take, tbh. The Glorious Revolution is best described as the very conscious decision of GB plc to appoint a non-executive chairman of the board. It was a masterpiece of political and religious pragmatism.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •