Originally Posted by Burney
Bowl, bowl and bowl again on this one
I suggest batting first, scoring quickly and then declaring when it gets dark.
I doubt it'll swing as much in the dark*
*This is based on a massive hunch with absolutely no credible data to back it up
a certain J Anderson has said that the pink ball doesn't do as much as the red one... just wobbles around a bit
Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar
Seeing as the white ball does feck all it would make sense that the pinkun does half of feck all.
I don't understand why it's possible to play test cricket with a red ball under lights if there's bad light, but not possible to play with a red ball under lights if it's dark.
The whole thing is a nonsense if you ask me.
All cricket matches should be played with a red Duke ball.
Very good, A.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Yes, but you always say that.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Not a bad call against this bowling attack! If Stokes and Bairstow get in against this bowling we could rack up 400 odd today, in fact we might anyway!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote