Not a peep out of Baroness Chakhrabarti on this yet, I don't imagine. Of course she was too busy praising the guy who fraudulently persecuted British soldiers at the time, I imagine.
Honestly, how can anyone deny the sheer moral bankruptcy of the left any longer? How can anyone read that story and not be absolutely furious?
Last edited by Burney; 02-22-2017 at 09:56 AM.
The thing is that everyone has lost their fücking minds. Milo is a provocateur who says what are at the end of the day silly, occasionally mildly offensive but often simply self-evident, but non-PC things. Essentially, what he does is say things that would have been largely unexceptional in about 1990. The extent to which one has to have entirely lost one's sense of perspective - indeed one's mind - to see such a man as the harbinger of fascist totalitarianism is simply off the fûcking scale.
You are such a babe in the woods. The Left has shown amazing innovation in the manufacture of pejorative terms. In fact, that you would even offer fascist and racist as examples of their word-smithery shows how out of the loop you are. A cuckservative, I might even go so far as to say.
Oh, I've heard all that shïte. They don't work as insults because most of them are laughable and anyone using them seriously instantly classifies themselves as a tit. And besides, many of them are simply terms in left-wing taxonomy rather than meaningful invective. I don't care if someone calls me heteronormative - I am and am happy to admit it. I don't believe 'trans' is actually a real thing, so calling me cisnormative or transphobic means nothing to me. Accepting those terms would involve buying into the bullshît in the first place - which I don't.
That's the thing, most of these terms are meaningless cant rather than worthwhile or valid neologisms.