Why do people keep doubling down on this utter, utter shīt? There is virtually no evidence of online abuse translating into actual harm to individuals, which means we are now policing people's hurty feels. Why?Originally Posted by Sir C
Why do people keep doubling down on this utter, utter shīt? There is virtually no evidence of online abuse translating into actual harm to individuals, which means we are now policing people's hurty feels. Why?
Because, and this is a scientific fact, about 18 months ago the world went suddenly bonkers.
I do agree. However, I do recall that you yourself have blamed social media for coarsening the way we interact with each other and making it socially acceptable to be a rude ****. So what to do other than regulate it?
I believe it absolutely has coarsened those things. The ability to say something nasty to someone and a/ not be around for the aftermath of hurt it causes and b/ be in no risk of a smack in the mouth have allowed people to lay off their inner editor. However, while I bemoan that, I don't think that means I have to advocate legislating about it, does it?
Agweed......
It's nice that you can mock your own speech impediment like this, m.
I always thought he had a deep and manly voice
Not a drippy one
10 characters? Pile of cund.
As I understand it, he sounds like a Regency fop.
I gather he sounds rather like Theo Walcott. Which is good.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Check out the actor James Woods on Twitter.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote