Are we now allowed to call his accuser a lying slag without getting told off by feminists?Originally Posted by PSRB
Are we now allowed to call his accuser a lying slag without getting told off by feminists?
Not really, no. Him being found not guilty does not axiomatically make her a liar.
Of course. But where would your money be?
I should probably add here that even if Evans' version of events is entirely true, I still consider that type of behaviour reprehensible.
What type of behaviour are you objecting to? If his evidence is true, he engaged in casual sex with a girl in the company of his friend. Are you claiming some moral sexual high ground here?
Oh you make it sound so wholesome and genteel! Running round the back of the hotel to spy through be window on a pissed chick ****ing your mate? Not for me, Clive.What type of behaviour are you objecting to? If his evidence is true, he engaged in casual sex with a girl in the company of his friend. Are you claiming some moral sexual high ground here?
I'm just interested that you, of all people, should have discovered the concept of decency, or morals.
Have you suffered a blow to the head recently?
FFS, we used always burst into a room where a friend was having high jinks with a lady friend, it would have been rude not too
I honestly wouldn't like to say without having been in court for both trials - which is sort of the point.
Similarly, being found guilty didn't make him a rapist?
glwtp, imo.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote