Reply With Quote2010 called and it wants its argument back.Originally Posted by Maravilloso Marvo
Can't we get Treeview back?
2010 called and it wants its argument back.
Welcome back Maravilloso
We should just be grateful this place still actually works.
It's like we survived a nuclear bomb
I didn't like that period of time.
I was huge eating english breakfast everyday in a cafe in paddington and wearing strange t-shirts and watching people fight in cage.
Whilst watching the likes of Chamakh play for arsenal.
Wenger out!Whilst watching the likes of Chamakh play for arsenal.
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
he appeased* us with those 3 FA cups.
for a while.
That's all fine, f, but why have you started writing like a caveman by omitting the definite article?I didn't like that period of time.
I was huge eating english breakfast everyday in a cafe in paddington and wearing strange t-shirts and watching people fight in cage.
Whilst watching the likes of Chamakh play for arsenal.
Also, was that during your hooker-bothering period or were you coming out of it at that point?
I am how you say, foreign.
what does mean hooker
Oh I appreciate that but seriously it is so fcuking hard to keep track of each branch of a thread. You have to run 4-5 different branches in your mind and pop each comment into the right one. I end up scrolling through trying to find the continuation of each branch to its conclusion before going back and picking a different branch.
I guess these problems aren't so prevalent on other forums where mods keep threads on track and stamp out what essentially makes Awimb Awimb. Who are the mods these days then? I would email JW but he is busy banging a big drum in a wood somewhere I think.
It isn't hard - the quote provides the context, and a quick glance puts you back on track. At least, that's how it seems to work fine for everyone else. HTH!
Posting Permissions