You don't think 'street party clashes' is an unusual and rather revealing way to describe significant civil unrest in which 15 police officers were injured, no? I mean, I can think of a single word that describes these events: rioting. But they didn't use that word. I wonder why?
If you think that's pusillanimous, try the Met's pathetic tweet (complete with Pride colours, of course - because that's what's really important: virtue signalling).
https://twitter.com/metpoliceuk/stat...79620488671233
There’s a theory stateside that Donald has played a blinder with this.
He could, at any time, invoke the insurrection act and wipe them (all of them) but won’t because this is just want the left want ie to be able to say that the evil dictator Trump is using the army to crush peaceful protests.
So he doesn’t...and just leaves them to go to ruins until the people beg for his help and he steps in and gives them what they want guaranteeing the re election.
The re election is interesting...I’m told to be careful in case we get a close win for trump because of the democratic states could easily turn around and say - yeah we know he won but we feel our electoral votes should go to Biden.
Game over on a stewards inquiry
Funny how they hid it three clicks away for the home page and labelled it as London. They put it up on the home page only after Sky had put it as a main story.
All MSM are tying themselves up in Knots at the moment but dear old Auntie Beeb is excelling herself and using our money to do so.
It’s the second highest story on the bbc app so not sure what bull**** you are spouting about it being hidden
It’s also been on the bbc news channel loop all day with the videos being played