Really don't have any time for this 'taking a knee' shít.

[Sir C]

Apart from anything else, didn't this whole problem start because a white guy decided kneeling would be a good idea?

Common Purpose will stop at nothing to bring down decadent, democratic capitalism; a few dead rioters and ruined livelihoods are a mere detail.

They were relatively calm whilst they had their soyboys Obama and Cameron safely installed, but the orange lunatic is driving them utterly mental.

Nothing would suit them better than a civil war in the US and UK; they can pick through the rubble at the end and install the true Global Marxism they so devoutly seek.

I'm taking my ponies off to the hills a-sap.

[Burney]

Common Purpose will stop at nothing to bring down decadent, democratic capitalism; a few dead rioters and ruined livelihoods are a mere detail.

They were relatively calm whilst they had their soyboys Obama and Cameron safely installed, but the orange lunatic is driving them utterly mental.

Nothing would suit them better than a civil war in the US and UK; they can pick through the rubble at the end and install the true Global Marxism they so devoutly seek.

I'm taking my ponies off to the hills a-sap.

Civilisations fall to the barbarians because they lose the will and belief in themselves not to. It really is true.

A healthy, non-decadent society that believed in itself would be shooting these people. Instead, we have most of our institutions cheering them on. It's totally f@cked.

[Sir C]

Civilisations fall to the barbarians because they lose the will and belief in themselves not to. It really is true.

A healthy, non-decadent society that believed in itself would be shooting these people. Instead, we have most of our institutions cheering them on. It's totally f@cked.

Exactly. Because those in charge of our institutions have all been on the course. They've all had the chip installed.

[WES]

Civilisations fall to the barbarians because they lose the will and belief in themselves not to. It really is true.

A healthy, non-decadent society that believed in itself would be shooting these people. Instead, we have most of our institutions cheering them on. It's totally f@cked.

A healthy, non-decadent society would shoot people for non-violent protest against what they view as an immoral act?

Whereas an unhealthy, decadent society would listen to them and then try and address any valid concerns they raised?

Interesting. By which I mean insane.

[AFC East]

A healthy, non-decadent society would shoot people for non-violent protest against what they view as an immoral act?

Whereas an unhealthy, decadent society would listen to them and then try and address any valid concerns they raised?

Interesting. By which I mean insane.

Taking anything Berni says with anything more than a grain of salt is insane

Remember when discussion was nuanced? Now it seems you're either a Nazi or a Marxist. Huge

[WES]

Taking anything Berni says with anything more than a grain of salt is insane

Remember when discussion was nuanced? Now it seems you're either a Nazi or a Marxist. Huge

Trump has probably never used the word ‘nuanced’ in his life.

And while I agree that the current trend towards labels and silos in any debate is dull, it is also potentially very dangerous. Especially when the president of the US of A seems incapable of any other type of thought.

[AFC East]

Trump has probably never used the word ‘nuanced’ in his life.

And while I agree that the current trend towards labels and silos in any debate is dull, it is also potentially very dangerous. Especially when the president of the US of A seems incapable of any other type of thought.

I agree, it's very dangerous and stupid. Amazing how people on both sides can't see that.

[Burney]

A healthy, non-decadent society would shoot people for non-violent protest against what they view as an immoral act?

Whereas an unhealthy, decadent society would listen to them and then try and address any valid concerns they raised?

Interesting. By which I mean insane.

Who's talking about 'non-violent protest'? I'm talking about feral scum rioting and looting. The non-violent protest ship sailed some time ago.

Oh, and what 'legitimate concerns' do young British people have about the behaviour of the Minneapolis Police Department, exactly? And how exactly does attacking members of the Met help address them?

[WES]

Who's talking about 'non-violent protest'? I'm talking about feral scum rioting and looting. The non-violent protest ship sailed some time ago.

Oh, and what 'legitimate concerns' do young British people have about the behaviour of the Minneapolis Police Department, exactly? And how exactly does attacking members of the Met help address them?

As you said that most of our institutions were cheering them on, I assumed you were talking about non-violent protesters.

Which of our institutions are cheering on the rioters and looters, exactly? Can you show us some examples?

[Burney]

As you said that most of our institutions were cheering them on, I assumed you were talking about non-violent protesters.

Which of our institutions are cheering on the rioters and looters, exactly? Can you show us some examples?

You can do the googling yourself, but there are the pictures of policemen kneeling before the same people who attacked them minutes later. There are endless media and political figures applauding exactly the same people who then - inevitably - went on to riot.

You can't separate the 'good' protest from the 'bad' riot because it's exactly the same people and it was always going to end the same way. If you encouraged this nonsense in any form, you encouraged its outcome. You don't get to cheer it all the way until the first brick is inevitably thrown and then wash your hands of it. You are culpable. You can't just abdicate moral responsibility for your actions like that.