For all the jot of us winning I know that there will be certain AWIMBers

[Pokster]

:sigh:

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/guard...cal-milestone/

:sigh: so use a 2018 article to try to make out that the mail aren't pro Tory in the 2019 election. good work wd b

[Burney]

:sigh: so use a 2018 article to try to make out that the mail aren't pro Tory in the 2019 election. good work wd b

I'm telling you something you clearly didn't know about the Mail editor's attitude to both Brexit and Johnson that gives context to the way in which his paper has reported this.
Is the Mail broadly pro-Tory? Yes, because if it weren't, it would lose its readership pretty much overnight. Does that mean the Mail won't take an opportunity to make Boris look bad? Absolutely not.
I'm sorry if you lack the ability to grasp that this isn't black-and-white, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to try and explain it to you.

[Pokster]

I'm telling you something you clearly didn't know about the Mail editor's attitude to both Brexit and Johnson that gives context to the way in which his paper has reported this.
Is the Mail broadly pro-Tory? Yes, because if it weren't, it would lose its readership pretty much overnight. Does that mean the Mail won't take an opportunity to make Boris look bad? Absolutely not.
I'm sorry if you lack the ability to grasp that this isn't black-and-white, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to try and explain it to you.

I said they are pro Tory (not broadly pro Tory) in this election, that was the point I made. And reading all the articles today they are far more anti Labour/Corbyn than anti Boris, in fact the story about the NHS is half way down and surrounded by anti labour articles.

I am fully aware that it isn't black and white and i am happy that we disagree, but we might as well leave it there as this will go back and forth all day otherwise