"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
The votes to take no deal off the table and extend Article 50 are likely to be meaningless. I listened to the EU Parliament debate this morning. There is little mood to consider an extension. Socialist/liberal types argue we don't know what we want, so there's no point. Conservative/Eurosceptics argue that the EU doesn't have the right to lock a sovereign state in the EU when we have voted to leave. None of them want a whole load more Uncle Nigels elected if we have to take part in EU elections in May.
No deal is now the likeliest outcome, though not certain.
Not sure I understand why the EU would extend? Unless I’m missing something by not extending we are forced into no deal - which we have made it clear we won’t do - or May’s deal, which the EU have agreed.
So they refuse to extend and we are forced into May’s deal, no?
Not if she can't get it through Parliament (which she patently can't), no.
A rejection of an extension means No Deal.
The only alternative is legislating to revoke of A50, which would be democratically indefensible and would represent electoral suicide for both major parties.