Originally Posted by Burney [/B] Well I guess it's a choice between those and actually ever retiring. Quite. Indeed, when the time comes, the collection might provide a useful boost to the fund.
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda But you never own a Patek Phillipe you just look after it for the next generation If I ever get to buy one I'm owning that fúcker, trust me.
Originally Posted by Sir C If I ever get to buy one I'm owning that fúcker, trust me. Pawning your watches? Good heavens. Why not just live off cat food and be done with it?
Originally Posted by Burney That's lucky. It is my everyday watch. Also, my only watch. Probably due a service.....that'll be cheap
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda But you never own a Patek Phillipe you just look after it for the next generation I thought that was really good marketing from them. Smitten with the JLC Master Ultra Thin Perpetual http://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/eu/e...l/130842J.html Glorious imo
Originally Posted by IUFG Did you go for the mid-size Seamaster? What with you having girl's wrists, and that... Yes, absolutely. Anything over 45 mm looks silly on me. Except the Monaco
Originally Posted by Burney Pawning your watches? Good heavens. Why not just live off cat food and be done with it? Not pawning, no. If anything, selling. They are an asset and, in some cases, an appreciating asset. The wise man cuts his suit according to his cloth.
Originally Posted by PSRB Probably due a service.....that'll be cheap Believe me, it's not. Indeed, you get the bill and ask yourself why you didn't just buy another fvcking watch.
Originally Posted by Sir C Not pawning, no. If anything, selling. They are an asset and, in some cases, an appreciating asset. The wise man cuts his suit according to his cloth. You've changed, man.
Originally Posted by Burney You've changed, man. No, I haven't.
Forum Rules