I believe we are offering Wilshere a pay cut.

[SWv2]

This is the thinking that has led us to be paying him millions for doing fück all for years, sw.

We have paid millions to loads of players for doing fúck all for years, reserve players, non first 11 players. It's football I'm afraid.

He has now regained fitness, proven his fitness, however you want to term it.

This is not like a Diaby where the lad was fúcked and was never un-fúcked. He is fit and as before unless there is a serious underlying medical condition then he is arguably no more likely to incur another long-term injury as any other player.

I just can’t see how we can choose to play him as we are, and then sit down with him and say we think you’re too high risk. If he is high risk fair enough, fúck him out the window.

[World's End Stella]

We have paid millions to loads of players for doing fúck all for years, reserve players, non first 11 players. It's football I'm afraid.

He has now regained fitness, proven his fitness, however you want to term it.

This is not like a Diaby where the lad was fúcked and was never un-fúcked. He is fit and as before unless there is a serious underlying medical condition then he is arguably no more likely to incur another long-term injury as any other player.

I just can’t see how we can choose to play him as we are, and then sit down with him and say we think you’re too high risk. If he is high risk fair enough, fúck him out the window.

Given nature of his injuries I don't think it is unreasonable to think they might be behind him.

And maybe it's me, but I thought he has looked heads and shoulders above the rest of the team recently and - more importantly - the sort of midfielder we need i.e. he actually plays in midfield.

And no, he shouldn't ever play next to that useless Welsh tw@t.

[Peter]

Given nature of his injuries I don't think it is unreasonable to think they might be behind him.

And maybe it's me, but I thought he has looked heads and shoulders above the rest of the team recently and - more importantly - the sort of midfielder we need i.e. he actually plays in midfield.

And no, he shouldn't ever play next to that useless Welsh tw@t.

Agreed. Given how hopelessly **** the rest of our midfield are we need to keep JAck- even if he only plays ten games a season.

It is not as if we are going to be terribly attractive to a host of top players. There are five better options just in england.

[Burney]

We have paid millions to loads of players for doing fúck all for years, reserve players, non first 11 players. It's football I'm afraid.

He has now regained fitness, proven his fitness, however you want to term it.

This is not like a Diaby where the lad was fúcked and was never un-fúcked. He is fit and as before unless there is a serious underlying medical condition then he is arguably no more likely to incur another long-term injury as any other player.

I just can’t see how we can choose to play him as we are, and then sit down with him and say we think you’re too high risk. If he is high risk fair enough, fúck him out the window.

Yes, but this is a rot we need to stop. Wilshere is injury prone and I can think of very few injury prone players who stop being injury prone and go on to have uninterrupted careers. I'm happy to see us being a bit more ruthless.

[Peter]

Yes, but this is a rot we need to stop. Wilshere is injury prone and I can think of very few injury prone players who stop being injury prone and go on to have uninterrupted careers. I'm happy to see us being a bit more ruthless.

That ruthlessness needs to start by getting rid of a dreadful manager, not getting rid of our best midfielder.

Let someone competent start making the ruthless decisions.

[Burney]

That ruthlessness needs to start by getting rid of a dreadful manager, not getting rid of our best midfielder.

Let someone competent start making the ruthless decisions.

He isn't our best midfielder. That's just sentimental böllocks. Get rid and start again.

[IUFG]

He isn't our best midfielder.

Correct.

Quite clearly that honour is bestowed upon Iwobi. Jeezus H ****ing Christ.

[Peter]

He isn't our best midfielder. That's just sentimental böllocks. Get rid and start again.

Aside from Cazorla, who is dead, he is- by a mile actually, although only because the others are stunningly mediocre or, in the case of Ramsey, incapable of actually playing in midfield.

[Burney]

Aside from Cazorla, who is dead, he is- by a mile actually, although only because the others are stunningly mediocre or, in the case of Ramsey, incapable of actually playing in midfield.

His record for us says otherwise.

[Ash]

Aside from Cazorla, who is dead, he is- by a mile actually, although only because the others are stunningly mediocre or, in the case of Ramsey, incapable of actually playing in midfield.

Ramsey is better in a three-man midfield, I reckon. At the moment Jack is looking like we need to get him signed up again, at least to avoid having to bring in about twelve new players in the next couple of years.