lightbulb-headed drugs cheat cùnt being grilled awkwardly about his failed test, while another lightbulb-headed drugs cheat cùnt was given the top accolade.
Obviously, I didn’t actually watch it. I’m not mentally ill.
lightbulb-headed drugs cheat cùnt being grilled awkwardly about his failed test, while another lightbulb-headed drugs cheat cùnt was given the top accolade.
Obviously, I didn’t actually watch it. I’m not mentally ill.
Credit to Bradley Wiggins wife for making me laugh out loud by calling Froome a 'slithering reptile'.
Oh, and I think they did something for Jess Ennis who, if you didn't know, was almost certainly doping as well.
Neg was on FB commenting in Belgie on Froome. Really is amazing how much he knows about drugs.
Well, we know that the Russian women that she defeated were doping and that doping has a dramatic effect on performance. So the question would be 'what are the odds that the best athlete from a country of 55mil can beat the best athlete from a country of 150mil people who is also doping, without doping herself?'. Can Jess Ennis really overcome the advantage of coming from a much larger gene pool plus the significant benefits of doping, without doping herself?
I would argue that the odds are small enough that she would fall into the 'more likely than not' category.