Originally Posted by
Burney
Anyone who tells you they're happy about a guy being paid public money to rape kids is pretty fùcked in the head, I'd suggest.
It's impossible to judge it without knowing every detail of the investigation. Were all other avenues explored first? Did the use of this guy speed up the process of rounding these guys up, thus saving (or at least curtailing the suffering) of other girls?
There's too many ethical imponderables to make a snap judgement about whether the ends justifies the means.