Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 61

Thread: Is the Tory party actually on a mission to alienate every single voter in the country

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    Surely we are still allowed to identify as our own gender rather than have some huge melting point? It doesn't matter how many weirdos and benders there are, I am still a bloke. You cant deny my right to identify as a geezer.
    But the reason we are now allowed to identity as we wish is because we now know that gender and sex emerge from our experiences rather than biological fact. So what we traditionally known to mean being homosexual or heterosexual (when you fancy people of the opposite gender/sex) no longer applies.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    But the reason we are now allowed to identity as we wish is because we now know that gender and sex emerge from our experiences rather than biological fact. So what we traditionally known to mean being homosexual or heterosexual (when you fancy people of the opposite gender/sex) no longer applies.
    How does sex emerge from our experiences ?
    Curious
    10 characters? Pile of cund.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Viva Prat Vegas View Post
    How does sex emerge from our experiences ?
    Curious
    https://www.autostraddle.com/its-tim...sogyny-240284/

  4. #4
    Laughable as that article is, it's also scary. Essentially, it is someone holding demonstrable facts up to ridicule and contempt based on an absurd, faith-based dogma. In essence, it's no different to a fundamentalist tract denouncing evolution or an article in Dabiq that holds western science in contempt because it clashes with the Koran. These people scare me.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    Laughable as that article is, it's also scary. Essentially, it is someone holding demonstrable facts up to ridicule and contempt based on an absurd, faith-based dogma. In essence, it's no different to a fundamentalist tract denouncing evolution or an article in Dabiq that holds western science in contempt because it clashes with the Koran. These people scare me.
    Both laughable and scary, you say?

    "Mey Valdivia Rude is a bisexual Latina trans woman living in Los Angeles. She's a writer, comic consultant and a trans activist. She's a bruja, a femme, a pop princess and she loves comic books, witches, dinosaurs and crying."
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Monty92; 07-24-2017 at 11:18 AM.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    Both laughable and scary, you say?

    "Mey Valdivia Rude is a bisexual Latina trans woman living in Los Angeles. She's a writer, comic consultant and a trans activist. She's a bruja, a femme, a pop princess and she loves comic books, witches, dinosaurs and crying."
    Blimey. Thank God these people have such high suicide rates.

  7. #7
    Couldn't we just change all toilets, changing rooms etc into, those who have a pen1s, those who have a vagina and those who have both go to the raspberry one?

    That wouldn't be discriminatory in any way, would it? And there would be no lack of clarity with regard to where you should go?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    But the reason we are now allowed to identity as we wish is because we now know that gender and sex emerge from our experiences rather than biological fact. So what we traditionally known to mean being homosexual or heterosexual (when you fancy people of the opposite gender/sex) no longer applies.
    Of course they still apply. What you have in your pants and what you want to have there remains different and distinct from where you want to stick it.

    For them, those traditional notions may not apply but for the rest of us they do. I am a bloke who fancies women and I identify as such. Whats wrong with that?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    Of course they still apply. What you have in your pants and what you want to have there remains different and distinct from where you want to stick it.

    For them, those traditional notions may not apply but for the rest of us they do. I am a bloke who fancies women and I identify as such. Whats wrong with that?
    What's wrong with that is that you use the nonsense of saying that that is how you 'identify' as opposed to saying that that is just plain and simple what you bloody well are. To say you 'identify' is to concede that those definitions are of your choosing or might at some point change. Once you concede that absolutes are negotiable, you're in trouble.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    What's wrong with that is that you use the nonsense of saying that that is how you 'identify' as opposed to saying that that is just plain and simple what you bloody well are. To say you 'identify' is to concede that those definitions are of your choosing or might at some point change. Once you concede that absolutes are negotiable, you're in trouble.
    Of course. But if you start going down that road they win. There is no end to this conversation other than to stick them in a third bog and let them say whatever the **** they want.

    And they are not having the op on the NHS either. **** that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •