In my never ending search at looking at houses. You think you find a good won

[Peter]

The current residents are - quite reasonably - kicking off at the idea of having to share their lovely new building with a variety of smoke-damaged pond life. Inevitably, they are being criticised for it by those who won't have to live anywhere near these people.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...medium=twitter

Hang on a minute. So the ones they have bought are actually the 'affordable housing' flats built alongside the luxury ones?

This is far less serious. If they are in a separate building and don't have access to the main one then it is far less worrying.

Ridiculous comments from Owen Jones. Makes himself look a right ****.

[Burney]

Hang on a minute. So the ones they have bought are actually the 'affordable housing' flats built alongside the luxury ones?

This is far less serious. If they are in a separate building and don't have access to the main one then it is far less worrying.

Ridiculous comments from Owen Jones. Makes himself look a right ****.

Owen Jones is a right cünt. There is no 'look' about it.

I don't think the 'affordable' flats were ever meant to be affordable to the sort of people who were living in Grenfell, though. Their presence will still significantly damage these people's property prices and quality of life.

[Peter]

Owen Jones is a right cünt. There is no 'look' about it.

I don't think the 'affordable' flats were ever meant to be affordable to the sort of people who were living in Grenfell, though. Their presence will still significantly damage these people's property prices and quality of life.

There is a considerable difference between affordable housing and council housing. I get the damage to property price but surely the priority is not having to live with them. As long as they are in a separate building I think it is manageable.

Not great, obviously....

[redgunamo]

There is a considerable difference between affordable housing and council housing. I get the damage to property price but surely the priority is not having to live with them. As long as they are in a separate building I think it is manageable.

Not great, obviously....

Yes. Looked at properly, that's what shotguns and hounds are for. Such things seem out of fashion in London nowadays though

[Pokster]

Hang on a minute. So the ones they have bought are actually the 'affordable housing' flats built alongside the luxury ones?

This is far less serious. If they are in a separate building and don't have access to the main one then it is far less worrying.

Ridiculous comments from Owen Jones. Makes himself look a right ****.

They have purchsed 68 flats for £10m so avg of £140k or so a flat.... sounds like a good deal to me

[the splendor of antigone]

They have purchsed 68 flats for £10m so avg of £140k or so a flat.... sounds like a good deal to me

Think of the real victims in this tragedy; the rich folks who now have to endure seeing blacks with boomboxes when they drive off in their luxury cars to the fanciest luxury restaurants and the like. It doesn't bear thinking about

[IUFG]

Think of the real victims in this tragedy; the rich folks who now have to endure seeing blacks with boomboxes when they drive off in their luxury cars to the fanciest luxury restaurants and the like. It doesn't bear thinking about

That might read as a leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetle bit racist, tsoa

[Burney]

That might read as a leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetle bit racist, tsoa

Also, his racial stereotypes seem to be stuck in 1985. Who the fück still has a boombox?

Mind you, at least he didn't call it what we *actually* used to call those items back in the 80s.

[the splendor of antigone]

Also, his racial stereotypes seem to be stuck in 1985. Who the fück still has a boombox?

That's the joke, my friend.

[IUFG]

That's the joke, my friend.

Watch an episode of Mind Your Language, that unequivocally proves racism isn't funny.