Maybe this mental illness explanation is not such a bad idea after all.

[Burney]

They can lock people up for being mentally ill, after all, can't they?

So if we assume that no sane person would massacre a group of children, or cut the testicles off their victims and stuff them into their victims mouths, as happened at Le Bataclan, and if we rightly don't want to demonise millions of peaceful people who happen to have been born into a religion which they can't leave because they'll get killed, then just call all Islamists insane and then they can be locked away in Broadmoor and the world becomes a safer place.

And stop destroying secular governments to the benefit of 'moderate' headchoppers, of course.

Think you might be on to something here, a. Bit soviet, but there you are.
Actually, it is interesting that the question of internment is getting into mainstream discussion. A lot of people confronted with the argument 'You can't just lock people up without a trial' do actually seem to be replying 'Why not?'

[Sir C]

Think you might be on to something here, a. Bit soviet, but there you are.
Actually, it is interesting that the question of internment is getting into mainstream discussion. A lot of people confronted with the argument 'You can't just lock people up without a trial' do actually seem to be replying 'Why not?'

Internment is expensive, of course, and we're already short of space in the prison system.

We need to be considering more efficient answers. Like machine guns with a simple swivel mounting. :mowing:

[Burney]

Internment is expensive, of course, and we're already short of space in the prison system.

We need to be considering more efficient answers. Like machine guns with a simple swivel mounting. :mowing:

Come, come. We're not animals. That said, I'm sure these chaps would be likely to attempt to escape at some point. At which stage, regrettably, we would have no choice but to open fire.