Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Results 1 to 10 of 124

Thread: So it turns out that eating raw fish might not have been such a good idea after all

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    The problem with sushi is that you get a wee bit of fish and a shedload of rice. For sushi I care little.

    Sashimi, good sashimi, is an entirely different beast. Sashimi is the good shít.
    But it is nonetheless fair to say that in general, raw, non-oily fish has at best a delicate flavour.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    But it is nonetheless fair to say that in general, raw, non-oily fish has at best a delicate flavour.
    You say, 'delicate flavour' as if that's a bad thing. There is a time and a place for big punchy flavours, and a time for delicacy, is there not? We aren't operating single note palates, surely?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    You say, 'delicate flavour' as if that's a bad thing. There is a time and a place for big punchy flavours, and a time for delicacy, is there not? We aren't operating single note palates, surely?
    Well, no. But - and here's the key thing for me - would that delicate flavour not be better served by being lightly fried and served with a beurre noisette? In other words, is raw fish as good as cooked fish? For me, the answer is no.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    Well, no. But - and here's the key thing for me - would that delicate flavour not be better served by being lightly fried and served with a beurre noisette? In other words, is raw fish as good as cooked fish? For me, the answer is no.
    That depends entirely on the fish. A plump Dover Sole? Get in the pan. A rigor mortis-fresh seabass? Sounds like ceviche material to me. A fatty lump of tuna? Sashimi, sashimi, sashimi.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    That depends entirely on the fish. A plump Dover Sole? Get in the pan. A rigor mortis-fresh seabass? Sounds like ceviche material to me. A fatty lump of tuna? Sashimi, sashimi, sashimi.
    Yes. I'd make an exception for oily fish, I think. But even there, is one not depriving oneself of the flavour of the searing by eating it raw? The jury is out for me.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    Yes. I'd make an exception for oily fish, I think. But even there, is one not depriving oneself of the flavour of the searing by eating it raw? The jury is out for me.
    I hope you don't feel that way about meat? Your mince in a bun for supper might not hit the spot

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    I hope you don't feel that way about meat? Your mince in a bun for supper might not hit the spot


    I think I've worked out what your treat for g is, btw.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •