to be moving and try and stop the throw in.Originally Posted by Pokster
you can be inside of 2m if you are stationary.
to be moving and try and stop the throw in.
you can be inside of 2m if you are stationary.
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
no he doesn't, he has to be 2 meters away from the point at which the throw is taken. He can be right on the touchline if he is 10 metres down the pitch
Not sure if this rule has changed recently but all opponents have to stand 2m from the ball at at throw in. Ref can warn the player once and only book him if he fails to retreat. Jones appeared unaware of this rule - useless ****. Him not you
https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afd...n_en_47365.pdf
It's how dagoes, eyeties* and such carry on, f.It's part of their culture.
*Not including your glw of course, who I'm sure would never go down theatrically having taken a ball to the face...oh, hang on, that's come out wrong, hasn't it?
I assure you Burney's point is correct. Dagos and Eyeties very much do this type sh*t.It's how dagoes, eyeties* and such carry on, f.
*Not including your glw of course, who I'm sure would never go down theatrically having taken a ball to the face...oh, hang on, that's come out wrong, hasn't it?
That said, there is this freaking hot Eyetie director chick whose shoot I will be crashing in a couple short weeks. The point being, one must prejudge if they have tits.
Shirley, it is the official's responsibility to make sure Sanchez is the correct distance away from the touch line. If they a happy with Sanchez's position when the throw is taking place then, in that instance, the thrower is guilty of ungentlemanly conduct and should be carded. What Sanchez did was embarrassing and its only achievement was getting the other guy off getting a 2nd yellow card
"Scoring a goal is better than sex" - Whoever said that was sticking it to the wrong woman
All these laws that involve people being x yards or y metres away are utterly ludicrous, of course, in a sport that doesn't have the means for measuring such things properly. Everything ends up being guessed at by the ref, which inevitably leads to dispute.
Mind you, I've always found the laws of football ridiculous, since so many of them are either widely ignored, impossible to enforce consistently or simply questions of interpretation.
It is in many ways, a very silly game.
Last edited by Burney; 04-27-2017 at 09:49 AM.
Right. That's the beauty of it, the genius behind it. That's why it's the best game in the world.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
I agree that it gives it an interesting element of randomness to the thing, which can be both charming and infuriating.
However, test cricket is the best game in the world. That's just a FACT.
I love test cricket but there's a reason it's dying; it's not as good as football.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote