Click here to join the Arsenal World community

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Kepa or Raya for the final

  1. #1

    Kepa or Raya for the final

    personally, I'd keep Raya as far away as possible, the last thing we need is him picking up an injury for the competitions that actually matter.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by PSRB View Post
    personally, I'd keep Raya as far away as possible, the last thing we need is him picking up an injury for the competitions that actually matter.
    Kepa's earned his start. Done nothing wrong and saved the vital pelanty in the shoot-out.

    I'd never heard of him before he signed for us but how does a 'keeper who previously cost ?85m - which I think was a world record - end up joining us for five?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by PSRB View Post
    personally, I'd keep Raya as far away as possible, the last thing we need is him picking up an injury for the competitions that actually matter.
    Definitely Kepa.

    Assume City will play Trafford.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    Kepa's earned his start. Done nothing wrong and saved the vital pelanty in the shoot-out.

    I'd never heard of him before he signed for us but how does a 'keeper who previously cost ?85m - which I think was a world record - end up joining us for five?
    He got Chelsead.

    He's a good keeper. FAR too good to sit as a number 2. I'm not complaining

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    He got Chelsead.

    He's a good keeper. FAR too good to sit as a number 2. I'm not complaining
    That's why I'm trying to work out why he's agreed to this.

    Could it be that being Chelsead has messed with his head that that being rich, he's happy for a relatively stress-free but well-paid life as a number two?

    Remember that before Cech, AW had never paid more than ?1m for a 'keeper. The most expensive won he had was inherited from GG, signed six years before he arrived.

    I much prefer Kepa to Cech, btw.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    That's why I'm trying to work out why he's agreed to this.

    Could it be that being Chelsead has messed with his head that that being rich, he's happy for a relatively stress-free but well-paid life as a number two?

    Remember that before Cech, AW had never paid more than ?1m for a 'keeper. The most expensive won he had was inherited from GG, signed six years before he arrived.

    I much prefer Kepa to Cech, btw.
    Probably wanted to stay in London but spurs really missed a trick there. As I've long suspected, Vicario is bang average.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by PSRB View Post
    personally, I'd keep Raya as far away as possible, the last thing we need is him picking up an injury for the competitions that actually matter.
    Raya punched a high ball the other night as well. Obviously needs a rest.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by redgunamo View Post
    Raya punched a high ball the other night as well. Obviously needs a rest.
    Remember in the old days when 'keepers caught the ball? The first time we saw 'keepers in Blighty punching the ball we considered them wrong'uns for their fancy, forrin ways.

    But now everyone punches. I don't remember 'keepers dropping the ball much - the likes of Lukic or Spunky. So why do they punch now? Is it harder to catch the ball - perhaps it's lighter and/or moves more in the air. {Though if the latter were true, you'd be better off trying to catch it.}

    Why did the change come about?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    Remember in the old days when 'keepers caught the ball? The first time we saw 'keepers in Blighty punching the ball we considered them wrong'uns for their fancy, forrin ways.

    But now everyone punches. I don't remember 'keepers dropping the ball much - the likes of Lukic or Spunky. So why do they punch now? Is it harder to catch the ball - perhaps it's lighter and/or moves more in the air. {Though if the latter were true, you'd be better off trying to catch it.}

    Why did the change come about?
    I agree. I do not know where they got the idea from and I don't like it.

    All I can imagine is that it allows for the employment of men who are otherwise good in goal but are simply not very good at actually catching the ball. Rather like the fashion for wicketkeepers that are, under other circumstances, pretty good at cricket but cannot catch very well.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    Remember in the old days when 'keepers caught the ball? The first time we saw 'keepers in Blighty punching the ball we considered them wrong'uns for their fancy, forrin ways.

    But now everyone punches. I don't remember 'keepers dropping the ball much - the likes of Lukic or Spunky. So why do they punch now? Is it harder to catch the ball - perhaps it's lighter and/or moves more in the air. {Though if the latter were true, you'd be better off trying to catch it.}

    Why did the change come about?
    I had assumed that, like many of thse things in the modern game; it'd be driven by statistics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •