Click here to join the Arsenal World community

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Gary Neville thinks Delap didn't make contact?

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Vegas View Post
    Not quite sure how Neville has a job.

    he just makes lots of noises, ooooooooooohh and I hate it.
    The Overlap was terrific today, with Paul Merson.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    But it was a clear and obvious error, just like that lino who thought Gabby was offside when nicking Vik's goal but wasn't.

    Not the lino's fault, it was tight and did look a bit iffy in real time.

    You needed a slow-mo close up to see just how blatant it was.

    Do you think the fact that if it was a foul, it would have to be a red scared them? Even if we miss the pen the Chavs aren't winning with ten.

    Didn't want the game to be all about their decision.

    Which would be strange cos they normally want to be the stars of the show.
    It certainly wouldn't have been a red card. A yellow, probably.

    Nobody can actually explain what constitutes a clear and obvious error. I think they felt that was a 'seen them given' rather than a 'nailed on'.

    The fact that Gary Neville thought it was a penalty (or feared might actually be a better word) tells you something.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    It certainly wouldn't have been a red card. A yellow, probably.

    Nobody can actually explain what constitutes a clear and obvious error. I think they felt that was a 'seen them given' rather than a 'nailed on'.

    The fact that Gary Neville thought it was a penalty (or feared might actually be a better word) tells you something.
    It was a blatant pen and it was a deliberate foul to deny a clear goalscoring opportunity.

    If our lad had done that I'd have both expected a pen and been fuming.

    cf Ricky C's shirt pull giving away a pen the other week, or Cesc's handball in the wall in the NLD.

    He clipped his heels to bring him down. The fact that the defender did it from the floor is irrelevant.

    Again, i think if it's a pen, which it is, it has to be a red and the ref bottled it as the game may have been scrappy but there was still all to play for and they didn't want to kill the "excitement" for a pen like that when they had the "but he won the ball and the leg raise COULD have been accidental" get out.

    That was a pen. BW does that and it gets given every time.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    It was a blatant pen and it was a deliberate foul to deny a clear goalscoring opportunity.

    If our lad had done that I'd have both expected a pen and been fuming.

    cf Ricky C's shirt pull giving away a pen the other week, or Cesc's handball in the wall in the NLD.

    He clipped his heels to bring him down. The fact that the defender did it from the floor is irrelevant.

    Again, i think if it's a pen, which it is, it has to be a red and the ref bottled it as the game may have been scrappy but there was still all to play for and they didn't want to kill the "excitement" for a pen like that when they had the "but he won the ball and the leg raise COULD have been accidental" get out.

    That was a pen. BW does that and it gets given every time.
    It isnt a clear goalscoring opportunity. He's heading away from goal and there is a defender inside him. Never a red card.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •