Click here to join the Arsenal World community

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: More goals for the Gyok, please

  1. #1

    More goals for the Gyok, please

    They all count

  2. #2
    Not now we?ve ground to a halt as our captain is on

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    They all count
    Martinelli is running them ragged

    Shame about his final ball

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by WES View Post
    Martinelli is running them ragged

    Shame about his final ball
    Not impressed with Madueke.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    They all count
    His goal was nice, wasn't it? The rest of his performance was a complete disaster, though I genuinley feel so bad for him... John Cross has been absolutely scathing about him in his arcticle this morning. I ususally don't like Cross but I can't really argue with what he is saying here.

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...vertz-36633138

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    His goal was nice, wasn't it? The rest of his performance was a complete disaster, though I genuinley feel so bad for him... John Cross has been absolutely scathing about him in his arcticle this morning. I ususally don't like Cross but I can't really argue with what he is saying here.

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...vertz-36633138
    That's funny, Rich, because I genuinely feel sorry for you, not Gyok

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    His goal was nice, wasn't it? The rest of his performance was a complete disaster, though I genuinley feel so bad for him... John Cross has been absolutely scathing about him in his arcticle this morning. I ususally don't like Cross but I can't really argue with what he is saying here.

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...vertz-36633138
    I'm not going to waste time reading all of that but the gist seems to be that Havertz is better than Gyokeres.

    Agreed. Hands down. Not even close.

    He's also a mile better than Gabriel Jesus. Are we going to **** on him as well? Or just Vik?

    John Cross is a prick. That isnt wholly relevant but I felt it needed saying.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    I'm not going to waste time reading all of that but the gist seems to be that Havertz is better than Gyokeres.

    Agreed. Hands down. Not even close.

    He's also a mile better than Gabriel Jesus. Are we going to **** on him as well? Or just Vik?

    John Cross is a prick. That isnt wholly relevant but I felt it needed saying.
    The quality of football journalism these days is, on the whole, shocking. I have though, for years said John Cross is an utter moron. Up there with Charlie Wyatt.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    I'm not going to waste time reading all of that but the gist seems to be that Havertz is better than Gyokeres.

    Agreed. Hands down. Not even close.

    He's also a mile better than Gabriel Jesus. Are we going to **** on him as well? Or just Vik?

    John Cross is a prick. That isnt wholly relevant but I felt it needed saying.
    As some of us said many times, Gyok was bought to replace Jesus, not Havertz.

    He provides depth and a different alternative up front. And we've seen more than enough good moments from him to be patient and give him time to adjust, both him to us and us to him.

    Martin Samuel published some stats the other day showing how much better our results are with Gyok both in the league and overall. Along with a nice line from Declan about how valuable he is.

    Stop embarassing yourself, Rich. It's unbecoming a grown man who supports Arsenal

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    I'm not going to waste time reading all of that but the gist seems to be that Havertz is better than Gyokeres.

    Agreed. Hands down. Not even close.

    He's also a mile better than Gabriel Jesus. Are we going to **** on him as well? Or just Vik?

    John Cross is a prick. That isnt wholly relevant but I felt it needed saying.
    It's a tabloid ffs. Sorry to be a snob but you might as well read the Alabama Maga-KKK-NRA Alliance Truth social feed.

    {Had another letter in The Times two days ago. Must be double figures now. Social media for the civilised. Oh, and they publish my letters whether I slag off their editorials or ambassadors or write letters about how crusties have more fun cos we have the best drugs. Civilised, see? Not a tabloid - even though it is by shape now.}

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •