Reply With QuoteMore suspicious is that ISIS claimed he was one of their soldiers, which contrary to popular assumption they pretty much never do without reason.Originally Posted by Ash
Two machine guns can be heard. Man on grassy knoll etc.
Two machine guns can be heard. Man on grassy knoll etc.
More suspicious is that ISIS claimed he was one of their soldiers, which contrary to popular assumption they pretty much never do without reason.Two machine guns can be heard. Man on grassy knoll etc.
Well the weirdest thing is that the shooter absolutely doesn't fit the profile for these kind of guys at all. A successful retired millionaire accountant who was also a high-stakes Vegas gambler and whom nobody realised even owned guns. It's not the usual pattern of bitter loser taking revenge on the world, is it?Two machine guns can be heard. Man on grassy knoll etc.
None of which is to say he didn't do it, of course. It's just a bit odd.
They normally supply evidence, though, don't they? Like a video of him committing to them or whatever.
Bin Laden always denied any involvement in 9/11. Just saying.....
He made it explicitly clear of his involvement in a video taped speech sent to Al Jazeera in 2004.
Wired $100,000 to his Philippine mrs, just before as well. All very odd.
Wasn't like he just snapped either, all highly planned out. Had plenty of time to have calmed down or thought about what he was about to do
One wonders if he'd had a rough diagnosis from the quack and decided to take a few with him?
Yeah, but he said it wasnt him. THat was an impressionist. Or something similar.
I think Monty is just clutching at straws in his desperate attempt to blame all the world's ills on muslims. Take the Westminster knife attack - very respectful of them to abide by the police embargo on not naming the attacker. Almost as if they had no idea who he was
Posting Permissions