Well, well...what a surprise. FFP.

**Mo Britain less Europe** · 04-10-2014, 10:28 AM

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/playing-th ibaut-courtois-against-chelsea-in-the-champions-league-would -cost-atletico-madrid-%E2%82%AC6-million-000352644.html

**Billy Goat Sverige** · 04-10-2014, 10:30 AM

**Mo Britain less Europe** · 04-10-2014, 10:31 AM

**Pat Vegas** · 04-10-2014, 10:31 AM

**Mo Britain less Europe** · 04-10-2014, 10:32 AM

**Billy Goat Sverige** · 04-10-2014, 10:34 AM

**Mo Britain less Europe** · 04-10-2014, 10:36 AM

rival (indeed against all other participants) through financial means.

**Billy Goat Sverige** · 04-10-2014, 10:41 AM

where the parent club can stop the player from playing against them. That's why the clause is there. If the rules were the same as the domestic ones there'd be no issue.

Do you whinge about this **** when one of our loaned out players in years gone by were not allowed to play against us?

**Mo Britain less Europe** · 04-10-2014, 10:43 AM

the world. Believe me, if they are drawn together and Courtois can't play there will be a major hoohah and the rules will change.

**Rich** · 04-10-2014, 10:51 AM

Thread: Well, well...what a surprise. FFP.

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Well, well...what a surprise. FFP.

That is nothing to do with FFP.

It has everything to do with FFP.

FFP bores have their head in the sand.

Maybe. Take the issue up with them.

In what sense? It's a loan agreement between two clubs.

It's an agreement designed to exercise a form of sporting control through financial means against a

Yeah but it was only put in there because UEFA rules are not the same as the domestic ones

This is not ****. This is gaining an unfair advantage in the most prestigious club competition in

But it's nothing to do with FFP.

Posting Permissions