Am I wrong in thinking that only Chelsea have conceded less goals (one i.e. 4 v 3) than us? and similarly, only Chelsea have a better goal difference than us 6 v 8
Man U have conceded 9, Man City 8 as has
So why are people mainly talk about Arsenal's defence when they discuss our chances?
we've not won a trophy for a bit.
Don't you think it would be strange to be that negative about the perennial English champions, the current English champions or the current European champions?
5 minutes discussing the goals that Arsenal have conceded and not a word about the rest of the team
They even showed the goal that Carroll scored against us when he played for Newcastle
Why don't they show some of our goals? All I am asking for is a balanced review, is that too much to ask for?
while you can improve things in a reasonably short time, it takes a while to build up the reputation for being solid and having a good defence.
Sky Sports are pandering to the majority of viewers. Why would they work hard to bring a balanced view when the majority of viewers are a bit thick.