The climate grift #358

[IUFG]

So you really think you know more about this than, say, James Lovelock, Companion of Honour and Fellow of the Royal Society, who came up with Gaia theory?

He invented the electron capture detector and, using it, became the first to detect the widespread presence of chlorofluorocarbons in the atmosphere. While designing scientific instruments for NASA, he developed the Gaia hypothesis. ...... He also worked for MI5 and was the real life Q.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lovelock

And you, despite never having studied this academically, think you know more about this subject than he does?

This is as bad as speaking to the pro-Palestine lot who've only ever heard of the Balfour Declaration but know nothing about the history of Palestine from the late Ottoman period onwards when I've got a ****ing first in Imperial History.

If you really think you know more than the experts who've devoted their entire lives to studying subjects then you have no idea how academia works.

easy, Tiger.

I know academia works for whoever is funding it. Just like everything else.

My mind about this was swayed years ago by a visit to GeoMon in Amlwch and their scientific explanation on rock formation and the climate 000'a of years ago. All of which, humans had little or no affect upon. Including the average temperature being way above what it is now. There is a reason the starting point for all these current measures was chosen to be in the 1800s.




Many believe an ideology not a science. Is prolific truant, Greta Thunberg a scientific expert? I thought not, yet one of the most influencial in this area, and she's basically come out as a rabid lefty - who knew? Who is funding her?

Extinction Rebellion? bunch of Marxist ****s again - http://www.resilience.org/stories/20...t-the-climate/

Just Stop Oil, the same.

Even Chuck was spectacularly wrong on climate http://www.independent.co.uk/climate...s-1738049.html


We'll disagree on this, shall we?