SSN: 'Marouane Fellaini in advanced talks with another premier league club'

[Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult]

To be honest, if you seek to live outside the law and ignore its strictures, then an example must be made to show that that is not acceptable.

Many of the problems we have in this country are because the police have ceased doing their jobs and making such examples.

Cool, B. Ever smoked a spliff? Ever driven at 71 mph on the motorway? Then I'll hide my identity and smash up your house so I can then brain Mrs Berni and all the little Bernis with my truncheon.

Gotta make an example of you crims.

[IUFG]

To be honest, if you seek to live outside the law and ignore its strictures, then an example must be made to show that that is not acceptable.

Many of the problems we have in this country are because the police have ceased doing their jobs and making such examples.

Tbf, the Met were generally a bunch of *****s in the 80s and 90s. Probably still are.

[Burney]

Cool, B. Ever smoked a spliff? Ever driven at 71 mph on the motorway? Then I'll hide my identity and smash up your house so I can then brain Mrs Berni and all the little Bernis with my truncheon.

Gotta make an example of you crims.

This comes down to the basic rule of 'don't take the fvcking p1ss'. Driving at 71 or having a spliff in one's home is fine. However, driving at 101 or smoking a spliff outside a police station isn't.

Equally, publicly flaunting the law on a mass scale (such as by driving 100 ****ty, untaxed, un-MOT'd vehicles onto private land without permission in order to get to a festival at a world heritage site that you know has been declared illegal by a High Court injunction) will get your head broken for you. And rightly so.

[IUFG]

This comes down to the basic rule of 'don't take the fvcking p1ss'. Driving at 71 or having a spliff in one's home is fine. However, driving at 101 or smoking a spliff outside a police station isn't.

Equally, publicly flaunting the law on a mass scale (such as by driving 100 ****ty, untaxed, un-MOT'd vehicles onto private land without permission in order to get to a festival at a world heritage site that you know has been declared illegal by a High Court injunction) will get your head broken for you. And rightly so.

pffft. We only wanted to listen to amplified repetitive beats and dance, b

Oh, and do stuff that wanted you to have a good time and be nice to others.

[Burney]

pffft. We only wanted to listen to amplified repetitive beats and dance, b

Oh, and do stuff that wanted you to have a good time and be nice to others.

Did this by any chance involve the large-scale public consumption of Class A drugs? It did, didn't it?

There's your problem, y'see? Taking the p1ss.

[Peter]

To be honest, if you seek to live outside the law and ignore its strictures, then an example must be made to show that that is not acceptable.

Many of the problems we have in this country are because the police have ceased doing their jobs and making such examples.

Going to a football match or striking is living outside the law?

THe problems we had in the 80s were due to the police not being subject to the law themselves.

[Sir C]

Going to a football match or striking is living outside the law?

THe problems we had in the 80s were due to the police not being subject to the law themselves.

Is that the royal 'we'? I had no problems with the police in the 80s because I didn't behave like an animal.

[IUFG]

... because I didn't behave like an animal.

Neither did I, sc.

I did 'enjoy' a Friday night detained at Holborn in the early 90s though.

I was arrested during a night out on suspicion of criminal damage. Locked me up, didn't interview me at all and then let me go without charge at 12.45pm on the Saturday lunchtime.

No explanation, no apology nor any breakfast. *****s.

[Sir C]

Neither did I, sc.

I did 'enjoy' a Friday night detained at Holborn in the early 90s though.

I was arrested during a night out on suspicion of criminal damage. Locked me up, didn't interview me at all and then let me go without charge at 12.45pm on the Saturday lunchtime.

No explanation, no apology nor any breakfast. *****s.

It's not exactly the Gestapo, is it? I take it they didn't pull your toenails out with pliers?

[Peter]

Is that the royal 'we'? I had no problems with the police in the 80s because I didn't behave like an animal.

Its the collective we of people who dont think it is ok for the police to attack and assault innocent people and then commit perjury and falsification of evidence to try and convict them. Or for them to make a fatal mistake that led directly to the death of 96 people and then lie about it for twenty five years including smearing the innocent and breathalysing children.

I wouldn't call it royal but I would like to think there are a few of us.