Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: In simple English, what is an "inverted" fullback?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Actually it’s basically a fully back who pushes into the midfield area so 4-2-3-1 ends up being a

    2-3-5

    Basically more nonsense…good ol fashion 442 will still work

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony C View Post
    Actually it’s basically a fully back who pushes into the midfield area so 4-2-3-1 ends up being a

    2-3-5

    Basically more nonsense…good ol fashion 442 will still work
    Cheers, TC. Ok. But how's that different to Lee and Nige or Hector and Nacho just getting forward as we've been used to since '88?

    Or put another way, when KT and Tomi were fit, were either of those an "inverted" fullback?

    And how does it compare with my beloved 4-1-4-1 in 2006, with Gilby DM, but Ca$hley and Eboué as attacking FBs?

    PS why doesn't the 4-1-4-1 work with Odin and ESR in the middle of the forward 4?

    I'd love to see that work.

  3. #3
    No you still don’t get it….

    It’s this ——->



    So basically we start off with

    Tommy
    White
    Gabriel
    Zinchenko

    Partey

    But after inversion it’s

    White
    Gabriel

    Dixon
    Partey
    Winterburn

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony C View Post
    No you still don’t get it….

    It’s this ——->



    So basically we start off with

    Tommy
    White
    Gabriel
    Zinchenko

    Partey

    But after inversion it’s

    White
    Gabriel

    Dixon
    Partey
    Winterburn
    Can we invert Jesus into Titi, Odin into Bergy and Xhaka into Chippy, then?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •