Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: India vs Australia - I believe the following sums up the Aussies

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I didn’t realise Jasprit was injured for this one.

    Going to be an absolute grind for India but at least it’s not a surprise so their mentality will be on point.

  2. #2
    Spectacular stuff....

    Needed 137 after tea too and didn’t need to win to retain the trophy...and their last few players were guys with zero batting experience. Even with 7 wickets remaining they could’ve lost quickly.

    But just a straight up beat down in the end. Aussies...all washed up...confirmed. Lost to an India B team cobbled together at the last moment because of injuries.

    That Pujara is a monster...batted for over 17 hours over the 4 matches.

    It’s just about minutes, balls and annoying the bowlers

    I’d have given him the Man of the Series award...why Cummins...loser team.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony C View Post
    Spectacular stuff....

    Needed 137 after tea too and didn’t need to win to retain the trophy...and their last few players were guys with zero batting experience. Even with 7 wickets remaining they could’ve lost quickly.

    But just a straight up beat down in the end. Aussies...all washed up...confirmed. Lost to an India B team cobbled together at the last moment because of injuries.

    That Pujara is a monster...batted for over 17 hours over the 4 matches.

    It’s just about minutes, balls and annoying the bowlers

    I’d have given him the Man of the Series award...why Cummins...loser team.
    When India still needed 50 or so, punters on Cricinfo were complaining that Che batting so slowly was gonna cost them the chance of victory. Idiots.

    I'd love him as our no.3 Fave Indian player atm. Everyone else wants to be a T20 slogger. He thinks Boycott and Gavaskar are a bit risk-taking.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    When India still needed 50 or so, punters on Cricinfo were complaining that Che batting so slowly was gonna cost them the chance of victory. Idiots.

    I'd love him as our no.3 Fave Indian player atm. Everyone else wants to be a T20 slogger. He thinks Boycott and Gavaskar are a bit risk-taking.
    Cracking player - definitely would walk into the England team (very slowly). Maybe not after Burns and Sibley though that might be a tad too slow. But Crawley can be the strokemaker at the top of the innings. We are going to get gubbed in India mind. One hell of a performance by them with so many players missing

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda View Post
    Cracking player - definitely would walk into the England team (very slowly). Maybe not after Burns and Sibley though that might be a tad too slow. But Crawley can be the strokemaker at the top of the innings. We are going to get gubbed in India mind. One hell of a performance by them with so many players missing
    Yup. We won when we had Swann and Panesar outbowling the Indians. Won't happen this time. Likewise, can't see us getting all of Che, Virat, Rahane and Pant out cheaply all the time.

    The good news is that India showed the cheating Convicts are beatable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •