You don't think 'street party clashes' is an unusual and rather revealing way to describe significant civil unrest in which 15 police officers were injured, no? I mean, I can think of a single word that describes these events: rioting. But they didn't use that word. I wonder why?
If you think that's pusillanimous, try the Met's pathetic tweet (complete with Pride colours, of course - because that's what's really important: virtue signalling).
https://twitter.com/metpoliceuk/stat...79620488671233
There’s a theory stateside that Donald has played a blinder with this.
He could, at any time, invoke the insurrection act and wipe them (all of them) but won’t because this is just want the left want ie to be able to say that the evil dictator Trump is using the army to crush peaceful protests.
So he doesn’t...and just leaves them to go to ruins until the people beg for his help and he steps in and gives them what they want guaranteeing the re election.
The re election is interesting...I’m told to be careful in case we get a close win for trump because of the democratic states could easily turn around and say - yeah we know he won but we feel our electoral votes should go to Biden.
Game over on a stewards inquiry