Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Slightly annoyed by the Walcott subsitution. I think he touched the ball twice at the most.

  1. #1

    Slightly annoyed by the Walcott subsitution. I think he touched the ball twice at the most.


  2. #2

    didn't mind that but Gibbs for Monreal annoyed me

    I thought he was excellent.

  3. #3

    <--- Not a fan. Especially since Wellbeck had been so involved.


  4. #4

    Walcott is **** in possession and all they were going to do was put everyone behind

    the ball. Pointless bringing him on.

  5. #5

    he is but he stays wider than Welbeck and we had to stretch it he pitch

    He is also more likely to take one half chance than Welbeck imo (not sure Welbeck would have got as close with the second goal) also Welbeck did a lot of work/running.
    I could see the sense in it, the Monreal one I saw no sense in at all, was making some really good runs.

  6. #6

    Nothing more than fresh legs, I suppose.


  7. #7

    he also stretches the pitch more

    Welbeck is more narrow and they absolutely packed the middle of the field.
    Better finisher as well.

  8. #8

    Ah, I was on about Nacho & Gibbo(?).

    #Welbz is a better defensive forward than Theo, imo. Same reasoning behind only bringing Rambo off the bench once our needs/position was clear, I think.

    Obviously, none of it worked though, of course.

  9. #9

    sorry ,r, I'm losing it

    Yeah must be just I thought Monreal was looking really good, made some excellent late runs, like the one for the goal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •