10 years. Whether or not the storm was quite as ferocious as suggested, the fact is that it existed and they were forecasting its arrival 5 days ago. That's some seriously clever computer modelling of an incredibly complicated process.
10 years. Whether or not the storm was quite as ferocious as suggested, the fact is that it existed and they were forecasting its arrival 5 days ago. That's some seriously clever computer modelling of an incredibly complicated process.
You know, the 60-80 mph winds. As predicted. With the occasional 90 mph gust. As they predicted? That storm, do you mean?
Office.
No trains running either which is nice
it was steady around 30 to 47 mph - which is just in force 6 to 7..just around atrong breeze to minor gale.. - with occasional gusts in 60 - 80- gale / storm force ( with max in certain areas 90odd) but big difference between steady 60 to 80 mph and gusts 60 to 80..it was a minor storm Sir C and the computers got over excited.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/observations/heat hrow-greater-london#?tab=last24hours&fcTime=1382828400
accurate climate models one day!
The 'Green' (Red) conspiracy is too strong, a.
Surely a company like Group 4 could do this for cheaper (the fact I'm on the board of G4 and they couldnt do it cheaper is neither here or there)
Plus it's tasked with achieving a profit so has to behave as a commercial enterprise.
wd mo.
They are a drain on our stretched resources, we need to farm them out at a huge, but crucially off balance sheet, cost.
Did thatcher die for nothing?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote