how can a player have a card rescinded when you can't retroactively punish a player?

**Son of a Gun** · 01-16-2013, 11:24 PM

In one case the ref saw it and deemed it a punishable offense, and then the offender gets to appeal the refs opinion.
In the other case the ref also saw it and deemed it non-punishable, but then it's not up for review.

Aren't the two events equal?

**eastgermanautos** · 01-16-2013, 11:27 PM

**Son of a Gun** · 01-17-2013, 11:11 AM

**barrybueno** · 01-16-2013, 11:30 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJX3F3XqL9c

**pjlincs** · 01-16-2013, 11:31 PM

**Son of a Gun** · 01-17-2013, 08:49 AM

up for review and the other not?

Thread: how can a player have a card rescinded when you can't retroactively punish a player?

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Hybrid View

how can a player have a card rescinded when you can't retroactively punish a player?

you can do the latter. barton 12 matches.

But normally they won't, right? And if so, why? Change the rules

sorry>>

If ref didn't see it then tv evidence can be used to punish retrospectively.

Yes, I'm aware of that. But when the ref HAS seen it, why is one case

Posting Permissions